From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
To: Samir Bellabes <sam@synack.fr>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] snet: Security for NETwork syscalls
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 11:57:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1262537872.10218.27.camel@bigi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1262437456-24476-1-git-send-email-sam@synack.fr>
Hi Samir,
This fills in a gap i always thought was missing from LSM's
boolean verdict policies. So good effort.
1)I would love to see the send/recvmsg interface complete (seems
missing).
2) If you can provide an async scheme which allows re-injection of
policy verdicts in addition to the sync interface, i think that would be
more valuable. I can see many apps which collect multiple states before
making a policy decision on multiple messages (example a multipart
message). Is SNET_VERDICT_PENDING intended for this?
A small glitch i noticed; you have defines in patches 8 and 9 which are
needed by patches 6 and 7. I think the general idea should be to compile
after adding each patch. So you may need to move some defines in earlier
patches.
cheers,
jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-03 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-02 13:04 [RFC 0/9] snet: Security for NETwork syscalls Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 1/9] lsm: add security_socket_closed() Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 18:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 2/9] Revert "lsm: Remove the socket_post_accept() hook" Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 18:36 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-05 0:31 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-01-05 0:38 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 3/9] snet: introduce security/snet, Makefile and Kconfig changes Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 18:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-06 6:04 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 4/9] snet: introduce snet_core.c and snet.h Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 14:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-06 18:23 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-06 19:46 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-06 19:58 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2010-01-23 2:07 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-23 2:18 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2010-01-07 14:34 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-07 14:53 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-07 14:58 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-08 4:32 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 18:42 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-06 6:12 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 5/9] snet: introduce snet_event.c and snet_event.h Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 20:09 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2010-01-02 23:38 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 19:08 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-08 7:21 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-08 15:34 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-08 17:44 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-08 17:51 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-08 18:10 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 6/9] snet: introduce snet_hooks.c and snet_hook.h Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 20:13 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2010-01-03 11:10 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-03 19:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-01-03 22:26 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 7/9] snet: introduce snet_netlink.c and snet_netlink.h Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 15:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-13 4:19 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-13 4:28 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-13 5:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-13 4:36 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-13 4:41 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-13 6:03 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-13 6:20 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-15 7:02 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-15 9:15 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-16 1:59 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-17 5:42 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-23 19:33 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 8/9] snet: introduce snet_verdict.c and snet_verdict.h Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 9/9] snet: introduce snet_utils.c and snet_utils.h Samir Bellabes
2010-01-03 16:57 ` jamal [this message]
2010-01-05 7:26 ` [RFC 0/9] snet: Security for NETwork syscalls Samir Bellabes
2010-01-05 8:20 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-01-05 14:09 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-06 0:23 ` [PATCH] LSM: Update comment on security_sock_rcv_skb Tetsuo Handa
2010-01-06 3:27 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-10 21:53 ` James Morris
2010-01-10 16:20 ` [RFC 0/9] snet: Security for NETwork syscalls jamal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1262537872.10218.27.camel@bigi \
--to=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=sam@synack.fr \
--cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).