From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Masters Subject: Re: debug: nt_conntrack and KVM crash Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:59:37 -0500 Message-ID: <1264816777.2793.510.camel@tonnant> References: <1264813832.2793.446.camel@tonnant> <1264816634.2793.505.camel@tonnant> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev , netfilter-devel , Eric Dumazet , Patrick McHardy To: linux-kernel Return-path: Received: from dallas.jonmasters.org ([72.29.103.172]:54345 "EHLO dallas.jonmasters.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754614Ab0A3B7q (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:59:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1264816634.2793.505.camel@tonnant> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 20:57 -0500, Jon Masters wrote: > Ah so I should have realized before but I wasn't looking at valid values > for the range of the hashtable yet, nf_conntrack_htable_size is getting > wildly out of whack. It goes from: > > (gdb) print nf_conntrack_hash_rnd > $1 = 2688505299 > (gdb) print nf_conntrack_htable_size > $2 = 16384 > > nf_conntrack_events: 1 > nf_conntrack_max: 65536 > > Shortly after booting, before being NULLed shortly after starting some > virtual machines (the hash isn't reset, whereas it is recomputed if the > hashtable is re-initialized after an intentional resizing operation): I mean the *seed* isn't changed, so I don't think it was resized intentionally. I wonder where else htable_size is fiddled with. Jon.