From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Balazs Scheidler Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] TProxy IPv6 support 2nd round Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:00:30 +0100 Message-ID: <1268557230.16066.20.camel@bzorp.balabit> References: <1253548300.12519.20.camel@bzorp.balabit> <20091025101612.GS29852@prithivi.gnumonks.org> <1256547636.11361.18.camel@bzorp.balabit> <4B94C57A.5010605@treenet.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Harald Welte , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Amos Jeffries Return-path: Received: from www.balabit.hu ([195.70.41.85]:48533 "EHLO lists.balabit.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754751Ab0CNJSf (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:18:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4B94C57A.5010605@treenet.co.nz> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 22:38 +1300, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Balazs Scheidler wrote: > > On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 11:16 +0100, Harald Welte wrote: > >> Dear Balazs, > >> > >> as you might have read from other mails (and by the long period of silence), > >> Patrick McHardy is currently unavailable to perform his usual maintainer > >> role. > >> > >> I personally am too much out of touch with recent developments in > >> netfitler-land to be able to confidently review your patches... > >> > >> So unless somebody else from the team (Jozsef?, Pablo?) feels confident in > >> ACKing your patchset, I will have to ask for your patience until Patrick is > >> back and can do it by himself. > > > > Thanks for letting me know, hopefully Patrick gets better soon. I've > > planned another round of the TProxy patches as I got some comments at > > the previous round I'm yet to address. > > > > So no need to hurry. > > > > Just bumping this topic up again. > > What is the current status of these patches? > > Our release which might make use of them goes into production sites in a > few weeks and I'm starting to see a little more interest in them from > our users. Well, no news ever since. I was backlogged with other stuff, so didn't push these too much. All I got was two comments to be fixed: 1) indentation should use tabs instead of spaces 2) the IPv6 address detection should be changed to use a function instead of relying on the first IPv6 address on the interface. Hopefully I can give this some care in the coming weeks. -- Bazsi