From: kaber@trash.net
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] netfilter: ip6table_raw: fix table priority
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:54:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1269539686-3885-4-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1269539686-3885-3-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net>
From: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
The order of the IPv6 raw table is currently reversed, that makes impossible
to use the NOTRACK target in IPv6: for example if someone enters
ip6tables -t raw -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 80 -j NOTRACK
and if we receive fragmented packets then the first fragment will be
untracked and thus skip nf_ct_frag6_gather (and conntrack), while all
subsequent fragments enter nf_ct_frag6_gather and reassembly will never
successfully be finished.
Singed-off-by: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
---
include/linux/netfilter_ipv6.h | 1 +
net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_raw.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6.h b/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6.h
index d654873..1f7e300 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6.h
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
enum nf_ip6_hook_priorities {
NF_IP6_PRI_FIRST = INT_MIN,
NF_IP6_PRI_CONNTRACK_DEFRAG = -400,
+ NF_IP6_PRI_RAW = -300,
NF_IP6_PRI_SELINUX_FIRST = -225,
NF_IP6_PRI_CONNTRACK = -200,
NF_IP6_PRI_MANGLE = -150,
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_raw.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_raw.c
index aef31a2..b9cf7cd 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_raw.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6table_raw.c
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static const struct xt_table packet_raw = {
.valid_hooks = RAW_VALID_HOOKS,
.me = THIS_MODULE,
.af = NFPROTO_IPV6,
- .priority = NF_IP6_PRI_FIRST,
+ .priority = NF_IP6_PRI_RAW,
};
/* The work comes in here from netfilter.c. */
--
1.6.5.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-25 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-25 17:54 [PATCH 0/4] netfilter fixes kaber
2010-03-25 17:54 ` [PATCH 1/4] netfilter: xt_recent: fix regression in rules using a zero hit_count kaber
2010-03-25 17:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: dl_seq_stop() fix kaber
2010-03-25 17:54 ` kaber [this message]
2010-03-25 17:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] netfilter: xt_hashlimit: IPV6 bugfix kaber
2010-03-25 19:47 ` [PATCH] netfilter: CLUSTERIP: clusterip_seq_stop() fix Eric Dumazet
2010-04-01 10:54 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-03-25 18:49 ` [PATCH 0/4] netfilter fixes David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1269539686-3885-4-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).