From: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@nokia.com>
To: ext Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>
Cc: ext Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
"netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org"
<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Changli Gao <xiaosuo@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] setting up throughput threshold indications to userspace
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:30:23 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1279517423.7097.2.camel@powerslave> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1007162127090.22666@obet.zrqbmnf.qr>
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 21:27 +0200, ext Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Friday 2010-07-16 15:10, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> >> > There is one problem with this solution, which is that it works in a
> >> > per-connection basis (due to CONNMARK). This is not exactly what I
> >> > want. I need to have this on a per-ruleset basis. For that, I need to
> >> > have a MARK (variable?) which can be set independently of connections or
> >> > packets. This is similar to the proposed condition match, but what is
> >> > missing there is a way to set the condition with iptables itself,
> >> > without requiring the userspace to change the procfs file. This could
> >> > probably be achieved with a "CONDITION" target or something similar.
> >> > Any ideas?
> >>
> >> Sounds useful.
> >
> >Okay, this was the kind of confirmation I wanted before jumping into the
> >implementation. ;) I'll implement this target soon.
>
> My suggestion to have it combined with xt_condition.
Yes, I also think that is the best idea. I'll implement a CONDITION
target that will work together with the condition match. For now I'll
use the non-final version you submitted some time ago.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-19 5:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-16 8:20 [RFC] setting up throughput threshold indications to userspace Luciano Coelho
2010-07-16 13:01 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-07-16 13:10 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-07-16 19:27 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-07-19 5:30 ` Luciano Coelho [this message]
2010-08-16 13:40 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-08-16 13:51 ` Changli Gao
2010-08-16 14:01 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-08-16 14:13 ` Changli Gao
2010-08-16 14:26 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-08-16 15:19 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-08-17 5:27 ` Luciano Coelho
2010-08-16 14:26 ` Changli Gao
2010-08-16 14:32 ` Luciano Coelho
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1279517423.7097.2.camel@powerslave \
--to=luciano.coelho@nokia.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=xiaosuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).