From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kaber@trash.net Subject: [PATCH 04/72] netfilter: nf_nat: no IP_NAT_RANGE_MAP_IPS flags when alloc_null_binding() Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:18:51 +0200 Message-ID: <1287674399-31455-5-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net> References: <1287674399-31455-1-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net> Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: davem@davemloft.net Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1287674399-31455-1-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org From: Changli Gao When alloc_null_binding(), no IP_NAT_RNAGE_MAP_IPS in flags means no IP address translation is needed. It isn't necessary to specify the address explicitly. Signed-off-by: Changli Gao Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy --- net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_rule.c | 17 ++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_rule.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_rule.c index ebbd319..21c3042 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_rule.c +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_rule.c @@ -106,16 +106,15 @@ alloc_null_binding(struct nf_conn *ct, unsigned int hooknum) { /* Force range to this IP; let proto decide mapping for per-proto parts (hence not IP_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED). - Use reply in case it's already been mangled (eg local packet). */ - __be32 ip - = (HOOK2MANIP(hooknum) == IP_NAT_MANIP_SRC - ? ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple.dst.u3.ip - : ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple.src.u3.ip); - struct nf_nat_range range - = { IP_NAT_RANGE_MAP_IPS, ip, ip, { 0 }, { 0 } }; - - pr_debug("Allocating NULL binding for %p (%pI4)\n", ct, &ip); + struct nf_nat_range range; + + range.flags = 0; + pr_debug("Allocating NULL binding for %p (%pI4)\n", ct, + HOOK2MANIP(hooknum) == IP_NAT_MANIP_SRC ? + &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple.dst.u3.ip : + &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple.src.u3.ip); + return nf_nat_setup_info(ct, &range, HOOK2MANIP(hooknum)); } -- 1.7.1