From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
Subject: Re: netns patches WAS( Re: [PATCH 8/8] net: Implement socketat.
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:52:06 -0400
Message-ID: <1288126326.2094.131.camel@mojatatu>
References: <m1ocborgq7.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
	 <m1bp7oq1u8.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>  <4C9B162E.7040201@parallels.com>
	 <1285240797.5036.5.camel@bigi>  <4C9B3B06.900@parallels.com>
	 <1285242055.5036.9.camel@bigi> <4C9B3F9C.8080506@parallels.com>
	 <4CA7A07C.5030504@free.fr>  <1286113441.3812.229.camel@bigi>
	 <1287145855.3642.30.camel@bigi>
Reply-To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@free.fr>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
	Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:52731 "EHLO
	mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755211Ab0JZUwO (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:52:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <1287145855.3642.30.camel@bigi>
Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org>

Eric,

Ping?
If you are too busy to push these in maybe have
someone clueful like Daniel help out submitting? I think it
should probably be reasonable to leave out the sockeat
patch initially if it is deemed controversial..

cheers,
jamal

On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 08:30 -0400, jamal wrote:
> Eric et al,
> 
> Did these patches make it in? I was looking at
> two Davem net trees and i dont see them.
> 
> cheers,
> jamal
>