From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans Schillstrom Subject: Re: [*v3 PATCH 02/22] IPVS: netns to services part 1 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:14:00 +0100 Message-ID: <1294046040.4983.60423.camel@seasc0214> References: <1293706266-27152-1-git-send-email-hans@schillstrom.com> <1293706266-27152-3-git-send-email-hans@schillstrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "hans@schillstrom.com" , "horms@verge.net.au" , "ja@ssi.bg" , "daniel.lezcano@free.fr" , "wensong@linux-vs.org" , "lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org" To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: lvs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 15:57 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Thursday 2010-12-30 11:50, hans@schillstrom.com wrote: > >+/* > >+ * Get net ptr from skb in traffic cases > >+ * use skb_sknet when call is from userland (ioctl or netlink) > >+ */ > >+static inline struct net *skb_net(struct sk_buff *skb) { > >+#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS > >+#ifdef CONFIG_IP_VS_DEBUG > >+ /* > >+ * This is used for debug only. > >+ * Start with the most likely hit > >+ * End with BUG > >+ */ > >+ if (likely(skb->dev && skb->dev->nd_net)) > >+ return dev_net(skb->dev); > >+ if (skb_dst(skb)->dev) > >+ return dev_net(skb_dst(skb)->dev); > >+ WARN(skb->sk,"Maybe skb_sknet should be used instead in %s() line:%d\n", > >+ __func__, __LINE__); > >+ if (likely(skb->sk && skb->sk->sk_net)) > >+ return sock_net(skb->sk); > >+ pr_err("There is no net ptr to find in the skb in %s() line:%d\n", > >+ __func__, __LINE__); > >+ BUG(); > >+#else > >+ return dev_net(skb->dev ? : skb_dst(skb)->dev); > >+#endif > >+#else > >+ return &init_net; > >+#endif > >+} > > Whether NETNS is disabled or not, dev_net(skb->dev) can be used in either case, > so the extra return &init_net case is not really required AFAICS. OK, but the debug part will not compile without the ifdef since there is some symbols that is #ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS. "&init_net" is faster than the " ? : " And the rest I guess is obvious. > > >@@ -3446,43 +3471,48 @@ static struct pernet_operations ipvs_control_ops = { > >- smp_wmb(); > >+ > >+ smp_wmb(); /* Do wee really need it now ? */ > > not "whee" :)