From: kaber@trash.net
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@balabit.hu>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] netfilter: add a missing include in nf_conntrack_reasm.c
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:22:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295554966-5263-8-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295554966-5263-1-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net>
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
After commit ae90bdeaeac6b (netfilter: fix compilation when conntrack is
disabled but tproxy is enabled) we have following warnings :
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:520:16: warning: symbol
'nf_ct_frag6_gather' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:591:6: warning: symbol
'nf_ct_frag6_output' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:612:5: warning: symbol
'nf_ct_frag6_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c:640:6: warning: symbol
'nf_ct_frag6_cleanup' was not declared. Should it be static?
Fix this including net/netfilter/ipv6/nf_defrag_ipv6.h
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
CC: KOVACS Krisztian <hidden@balabit.hu>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
---
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
index 66e003e..0857272 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
#include <linux/netfilter_ipv6.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <net/netfilter/ipv6/nf_defrag_ipv6.h>
struct nf_ct_frag6_skb_cb
--
1.7.3.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-20 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-20 20:22 [PATCH 0/7] netfilter: netfilter fixes for net-next kaber
2011-01-20 20:22 ` [PATCH 1/7] netfilter: xtables: connlimit revision 1 kaber
2011-01-20 20:22 ` [PATCH 2/7] netfilter: do not omit re-route check on NF_QUEUE verdict kaber
2011-01-20 20:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] netfilter: xtables: remove duplicate member kaber
2011-01-20 20:22 ` [PATCH 4/7] netfilter: nf_nat: place conntrack in source hash after SNAT is done kaber
2011-01-20 20:22 ` [PATCH 5/7] netfilter: xtables: add missing header inclusions for headers_check kaber
2011-01-20 20:22 ` [PATCH 6/7] netfilter: nf_conntrack: fix linker error with NF_CONNTRACK_TIMESTAMP=n kaber
2011-01-20 20:22 ` kaber [this message]
2011-01-21 0:38 ` [PATCH 0/7] netfilter: netfilter fixes for net-next David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295554966-5263-8-git-send-email-kaber@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=hidden@balabit.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).