From: Thomas Jacob <jacob@internet24.de>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Jacob <jacob@internet24.de>
Subject: [PATCH] Incorrect xt_iprange boundary check for IPv6 (V3)
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 15:00:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295877620-2399-2-git-send-email-jacob@internet24.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295877620-2399-1-git-send-email-jacob@internet24.de>
Variant 3
iprange_ipv6_sub was substracting 2 unsigned ints and then casting
the result to int to find out whether they are lt, eq or gt each
other, this doesn't work if the full 32 bits of each part
can be used in IPv6 addresses. Patch should remedy that without
significant performance penalties. Also the number of ntohl
calls can be reduced this way (Jozsef Kadlecsik).
In order to take advantage of the fact that that we are dealing
with ordered interval borders, combine checks for both interval
borders into one function to skip some tests that would
always result in false anyway.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Jacob <jacob@internet24.de>
---
net/netfilter/xt_iprange.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_iprange.c b/net/netfilter/xt_iprange.c
index 4b5741b..8186f63 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_iprange.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_iprange.c
@@ -96,15 +96,19 @@ iprange_mt4(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *in,
}
static inline int
-iprange_ipv6_sub(const struct in6_addr *a, const struct in6_addr *b)
+iprange_ipv6_cmp(const struct in6_addr *a, const struct in6_addr *b,
+ const struct in6_addr *x)
{
unsigned int i;
- int r;
for (i = 0; i < 4; ++i) {
- r = ntohl(a->s6_addr32[i]) - ntohl(b->s6_addr32[i]);
- if (r != 0)
- return r;
+ if (x->s6_addr32[i] != a->s6_addr32[i] &&
+ ntohl(x->s6_addr32[i]) < ntohl(a->s6_addr32[i]))
+ return 1;
+
+ if (x->s6_addr32[i] != b->s6_addr32[i] &&
+ ntohl(b->s6_addr32[i]) < ntohl(x->s6_addr32[i]))
+ return 1;
}
return 0;
@@ -121,15 +125,13 @@ iprange_mt6(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *in,
bool m;
if (info->flags & IPRANGE_SRC) {
- m = iprange_ipv6_sub(&iph->saddr, &info->src_min.in6) < 0;
- m |= iprange_ipv6_sub(&iph->saddr, &info->src_max.in6) > 0;
+ m = iprange_ipv6_cmp(&info->src_min.in6, &info->src_max.in6, &iph->saddr);
m ^= !!(info->flags & IPRANGE_SRC_INV);
if (m)
return false;
}
if (info->flags & IPRANGE_DST) {
- m = iprange_ipv6_sub(&iph->daddr, &info->dst_min.in6) < 0;
- m |= iprange_ipv6_sub(&iph->daddr, &info->dst_max.in6) > 0;
+ m = iprange_ipv6_cmp(&info->dst_min.in6, &info->dst_max.in6, &iph->daddr);
m ^= !!(info->flags & IPRANGE_DST_INV);
if (m)
return false;
--
1.5.6.5
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-24 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-24 14:00 Incorrect xt_iprange boundary check for IPv6 (Variant 3) Thomas Jacob
2011-01-24 14:00 ` Thomas Jacob [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1295877620-2399-2-git-send-email-jacob@internet24.de \
--to=jacob@internet24.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).