From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Volkov Subject: Re: iptables branch management Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 13:31:45 +0400 Message-ID: <1315560705.10959.3.camel@tablet> References: <20110905175425.GC32733@1984> <4E68935B.3000401@trash.net> <4E68BAA8.5010501@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Patrick McHardy , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Netfilter Developer Mailing List To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:46619 "EHLO smtp.gentoo.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753406Ab1IIJcx (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Sep 2011 05:32:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =D0=92 =D0=A7=D1=82=D0=B2, 08/09/2011 =D0=B2 16:41 +0200, Jan Engelhard= t =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > Oh we are nicely accumulating fixes & trivials already - do not worry= =20 > about that. Just let me pull this off, all it means is that > there is another branch head on iptables.git, and something convenien= t=20 > for the release manager to tag should the need arise for a .y release= =2E=20 > Users already seem to like the idea[1]. > [1] http://marc.info/?l=3Dnetfilter-devel&m=3D131499886708085&w=3D2 As the iptables maintainer in Gentoo I really appreciate such branch management. BTW, I'd like to know how long stable branch will be maintained? Or IOW how we'll find out that it's not maintained any more= ? With best regards, -- Peter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-dev= el" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html