From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Cc: lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: [RFC] IPVS: secure_tcp does provide alternate state timeouts
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:25:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317281111-23985-1-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> (raw)
* Also reword the test to make it read more easily (to me)
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
---
Julian, I don't see that IPVS currently implements alternate
timeouts for secure_tcp. Am I missing something?
---
Documentation/networking/ipvs-sysctl.txt | 10 ++++------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/ipvs-sysctl.txt b/Documentation/networking/ipvs-sysctl.txt
index 1dcdd49..13610e3 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/ipvs-sysctl.txt
+++ b/Documentation/networking/ipvs-sysctl.txt
@@ -140,13 +140,11 @@ nat_icmp_send - BOOLEAN
secure_tcp - INTEGER
0 - disabled (default)
- The secure_tcp defense is to use a more complicated state
- transition table and some possible short timeouts of each
- state. In the VS/NAT, it delays the entering the ESTABLISHED
- until the real server starts to send data and ACK packet
- (after 3-way handshake).
+ The secure_tcp defense is to use a more complicated TCP state
+ transition table. For VS/NAT, it also delays entering the
+ TCP ESTABLISHED state until the three way handshake is completed.
- The value definition is the same as that of drop_entry or
+ The value definition is the same as that of drop_entry and
drop_packet.
sync_threshold - INTEGER
--
1.7.5.4
next reply other threads:[~2011-09-29 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-29 7:25 Simon Horman [this message]
2011-09-29 8:47 ` [RFC] IPVS: secure_tcp does provide alternate state timeouts Julian Anastasov
2011-09-29 9:01 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1317281111-23985-1-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).