* [PATCH] conntrack: avoid unnecessary lock in tcp_packet
@ 2011-12-06 12:35 Feng King
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Feng King @ 2011-12-06 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel; +Cc: kaber, netdev, davem, Feng King, Feng Jin
when IPS_SEQ_ADJUST_BIT is not set, there are no need to obtain
net_offset in tcp_in_window from tcp_packet.
nat_offset will acquire global nf_nat_seqofs_lock spinlock,
and on heavy load, there will be big contention. After 30 secs webbench
stress testing, we can see from lockstat:
nf_nat_seqofs_lock: 798200 798213
1.01 57.37 216229.42 9943722
10055712 0.61 60.70
1909636.49
and from perf report, nf_nat_get_offset contributes 18.49% of our
overall spin_lock_bh cost, It's unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Feng Jin <ronyjin@tencent.com>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
index 8235b86..88c70f1 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c
@@ -502,7 +502,8 @@ static inline s16 nat_offset(const struct nf_conn *ct,
return get_offset != NULL ? get_offset(ct, dir, seq) : 0;
}
#define NAT_OFFSET(pf, ct, dir, seq) \
- (pf == NFPROTO_IPV4 ? nat_offset(ct, dir, seq) : 0)
+ ((pf == NFPROTO_IPV4) && test_bit(IPS_SEQ_ADJUST_BIT, &ct->status) \
+ ? nat_offset(ct, dir, seq) : 0)
#else
#define NAT_OFFSET(pf, ct, dir, seq) 0
#endif
--
1.7.7.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-12-06 12:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-06 12:35 [PATCH] conntrack: avoid unnecessary lock in tcp_packet Feng King
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).