From: Hans Schillstrom <hans@schillstrom.com>
To: pablo@netfilter.org, kaber@trash.net, jengelh@medozas.de,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
dan.carpenter@oracle.com
Cc: hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com, Hans Schillstrom <hans@schillstrom.com>
Subject: [v2 PATCH] netfilter: xt_HMARK: fix endian bugs and warnings
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 10:35:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1337330146-26305-1-git-send-email-hans@schillstrom.com> (raw)
A mix of u32 and __be32 causes endian warning.
The hash value produced is now the same for big and little endian machines.
i.e. a mix of Big and Little endian in a cluster is now possible.
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Hans Schillstrom <hans@schillstrom.com>
---
include/linux/netfilter/xt_HMARK.h | 5 +++
net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/xt_HMARK.h b/include/linux/netfilter/xt_HMARK.h
index abb1650..826fc58 100644
--- a/include/linux/netfilter/xt_HMARK.h
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter/xt_HMARK.h
@@ -27,7 +27,12 @@ union hmark_ports {
__u16 src;
__u16 dst;
} p16;
+ struct {
+ __be16 src;
+ __be16 dst;
+ } b16;
__u32 v32;
+ __be32 b32;
};
struct xt_hmark_info {
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c b/net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c
index 0a96a43..5119666 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_HMARK.c
@@ -32,13 +32,13 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("ipt_HMARK");
MODULE_ALIAS("ip6t_HMARK");
struct hmark_tuple {
- u32 src;
- u32 dst;
+ __be32 src;
+ __be32 dst;
union hmark_ports uports;
uint8_t proto;
};
-static inline u32 hmark_addr6_mask(const __u32 *addr32, const __u32 *mask)
+static inline __be32 hmark_addr6_mask(const __be32 *addr32, const __be32 *mask)
{
return (addr32[0] & mask[0]) ^
(addr32[1] & mask[1]) ^
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ static inline u32 hmark_addr6_mask(const __u32 *addr32, const __u32 *mask)
(addr32[3] & mask[3]);
}
-static inline u32
-hmark_addr_mask(int l3num, const __u32 *addr32, const __u32 *mask)
+static inline __be32
+hmark_addr_mask(int l3num, const __be32 *addr32, const __be32 *mask)
{
switch (l3num) {
case AF_INET:
@@ -58,6 +58,22 @@ hmark_addr_mask(int l3num, const __u32 *addr32, const __u32 *mask)
return 0;
}
+static inline void hmark_swap_ports(union hmark_ports *uports,
+ const struct xt_hmark_info *info)
+{
+ union hmark_ports hp;
+ u16 src,dst;
+
+ hp.b32 = (uports->b32 & info->port_mask.b32) | info->port_set.b32;
+ src = ntohs(hp.b16.src);
+ dst = ntohs(hp.b16.dst);
+
+ if (dst > src)
+ uports->v32 = (dst << 16) | src;
+ else
+ uports->v32 = (src << 16) | dst;
+}
+
static int
hmark_ct_set_htuple(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct hmark_tuple *t,
const struct xt_hmark_info *info)
@@ -74,22 +90,19 @@ hmark_ct_set_htuple(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct hmark_tuple *t,
otuple = &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple;
rtuple = &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple;
- t->src = hmark_addr_mask(otuple->src.l3num, otuple->src.u3.all,
- info->src_mask.all);
- t->dst = hmark_addr_mask(otuple->src.l3num, rtuple->src.u3.all,
- info->dst_mask.all);
+ t->src = hmark_addr_mask(otuple->src.l3num, otuple->src.u3.ip6,
+ info->src_mask.ip6);
+ t->dst = hmark_addr_mask(otuple->src.l3num, rtuple->src.u3.ip6,
+ info->dst_mask.ip6);
if (info->flags & XT_HMARK_FLAG(XT_HMARK_METHOD_L3))
return 0;
t->proto = nf_ct_protonum(ct);
if (t->proto != IPPROTO_ICMP) {
- t->uports.p16.src = otuple->src.u.all;
- t->uports.p16.dst = rtuple->src.u.all;
- t->uports.v32 = (t->uports.v32 & info->port_mask.v32) |
- info->port_set.v32;
- if (t->uports.p16.dst < t->uports.p16.src)
- swap(t->uports.p16.dst, t->uports.p16.src);
+ t->uports.b16.src = otuple->src.u.all;
+ t->uports.b16.dst = rtuple->src.u.all;
+ hmark_swap_ports(&t->uports, info);
}
return 0;
@@ -102,11 +115,13 @@ static inline u32
hmark_hash(struct hmark_tuple *t, const struct xt_hmark_info *info)
{
u32 hash;
+ u32 src = ntohl(t->src);
+ u32 dst = ntohl(t->dst);
- if (t->dst < t->src)
- swap(t->src, t->dst);
+ if (dst < src)
+ swap(src, dst);
- hash = jhash_3words(t->src, t->dst, t->uports.v32, info->hashrnd);
+ hash = jhash_3words(src, dst, t->uports.v32, info->hashrnd);
hash = hash ^ (t->proto & info->proto_mask);
return (((u64)hash * info->hmodulus) >> 32) + info->hoffset;
@@ -125,12 +140,7 @@ hmark_set_tuple_ports(const struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int nhoff,
nhoff += protoff;
if (skb_copy_bits(skb, nhoff, &t->uports, sizeof(t->uports)) < 0)
return;
-
- t->uports.v32 = (t->uports.v32 & info->port_mask.v32) |
- info->port_set.v32;
-
- if (t->uports.p16.dst < t->uports.p16.src)
- swap(t->uports.p16.dst, t->uports.p16.src);
+ hmark_swap_ports(&t->uports, info);
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IP6_NF_IPTABLES)
@@ -178,8 +188,8 @@ hmark_pkt_set_htuple_ipv6(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct hmark_tuple *t,
return -1;
}
noicmp:
- t->src = hmark_addr6_mask(ip6->saddr.s6_addr32, info->src_mask.all);
- t->dst = hmark_addr6_mask(ip6->daddr.s6_addr32, info->dst_mask.all);
+ t->src = hmark_addr6_mask(ip6->saddr.s6_addr32, info->src_mask.ip6);
+ t->dst = hmark_addr6_mask(ip6->daddr.s6_addr32, info->dst_mask.ip6);
if (info->flags & XT_HMARK_FLAG(XT_HMARK_METHOD_L3))
return 0;
@@ -255,11 +265,8 @@ hmark_pkt_set_htuple_ipv4(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct hmark_tuple *t,
}
}
- t->src = (__force u32) ip->saddr;
- t->dst = (__force u32) ip->daddr;
-
- t->src &= info->src_mask.ip;
- t->dst &= info->dst_mask.ip;
+ t->src = ip->saddr & info->src_mask.ip;
+ t->dst = ip->daddr & info->dst_mask.ip;
if (info->flags & XT_HMARK_FLAG(XT_HMARK_METHOD_L3))
return 0;
--
1.7.2.3
next reply other threads:[~2012-05-18 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-18 8:35 Hans Schillstrom [this message]
2012-06-05 23:41 ` [v2 PATCH] netfilter: xt_HMARK: fix endian bugs and warnings Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1337330146-26305-1-git-send-email-hans@schillstrom.com \
--to=hans@schillstrom.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).