From: pablo@netfilter.org
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 19/25] netfilter: NFQUEUE: don't xor src/dst ip address for load distribution
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:43:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339425841-24171-20-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339425841-24171-1-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org>
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
because reply packets need to go to the same nfqueue, src/dst ip
address were xor'd prior to jhash().
However, this causes bad distribution for some workloads, e.g.
flows a.b.1.{1,n} -> a.b.2.{1,n} all share the same hash value.
Avoid this by hashing both. To get same hash for replies,
first argument is the smaller address.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c b/net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c
index 95237c8..7babe7d 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.c
@@ -41,26 +41,36 @@ nfqueue_tg(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct xt_action_param *par)
static u32 hash_v4(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
- __be32 ipaddr;
/* packets in either direction go into same queue */
- ipaddr = iph->saddr ^ iph->daddr;
+ if (iph->saddr < iph->daddr)
+ return jhash_3words((__force u32)iph->saddr,
+ (__force u32)iph->daddr, iph->protocol, jhash_initval);
- return jhash_2words((__force u32)ipaddr, iph->protocol, jhash_initval);
+ return jhash_3words((__force u32)iph->daddr,
+ (__force u32)iph->saddr, iph->protocol, jhash_initval);
}
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IP6_NF_IPTABLES)
static u32 hash_v6(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
const struct ipv6hdr *ip6h = ipv6_hdr(skb);
- __be32 addr[4];
+ u32 a, b, c;
+
+ if (ip6h->saddr.s6_addr32[3] < ip6h->daddr.s6_addr32[3]) {
+ a = (__force u32) ip6h->saddr.s6_addr32[3];
+ b = (__force u32) ip6h->daddr.s6_addr32[3];
+ } else {
+ b = (__force u32) ip6h->saddr.s6_addr32[3];
+ a = (__force u32) ip6h->daddr.s6_addr32[3];
+ }
- addr[0] = ip6h->saddr.s6_addr32[0] ^ ip6h->daddr.s6_addr32[0];
- addr[1] = ip6h->saddr.s6_addr32[1] ^ ip6h->daddr.s6_addr32[1];
- addr[2] = ip6h->saddr.s6_addr32[2] ^ ip6h->daddr.s6_addr32[2];
- addr[3] = ip6h->saddr.s6_addr32[3] ^ ip6h->daddr.s6_addr32[3];
+ if (ip6h->saddr.s6_addr32[1] < ip6h->daddr.s6_addr32[1])
+ c = (__force u32) ip6h->saddr.s6_addr32[1];
+ else
+ c = (__force u32) ip6h->daddr.s6_addr32[1];
- return jhash2((__force u32 *)addr, ARRAY_SIZE(addr), jhash_initval);
+ return jhash_3words(a, b, c, jhash_initval);
}
#endif
--
1.7.10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-11 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-11 14:43 [PATCH 00/25] netfilter updates from net-next (upcoming 3.6) pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 01/25] netfilter: remove include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_addrtype.h pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 02/25] netfilter: xt_connlimit: remove revision 0 pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 03/25] netfilter: Add fail-open support pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 04/25] netfilter: nf_conntrack: prepare namespace support for l4 protocol trackers pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 05/25] netfilter: nf_conntrack: prepare namespace support for l3 " pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 06/25] netfilter: nf_ct_generic: add namespace support pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 07/25] netfilter: nf_ct_tcp: " pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 08/25] netfilter: nf_ct_udp: " pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 09/25] netfilter: nf_ct_icmp: " pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 10/25] " pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 11/25] netfilter: nf_ct_ipv4: " pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 12/25] netfilter: nf_ct_ipv6: " pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 13/25] netfilter: nf_ct_sctp: " pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 14/25] netfilter: nf_ct_udplite: " pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 15/25] netfilter: nf_ct_dccp: use new " pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 16/25] netfilter: nf_ct_gre: " pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 17/25] netfilter: nf_conntrack: remove now unused sysctl for nf_conntrack_l[3|4]proto pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 18/25] netfilter: nf_conntrack: add namespace support for cttimeout pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` pablo [this message]
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 20/25] netfilter: xt_recent: add address masking option pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 21/25] netfilter: decnet: switch hook PFs to nfproto pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 22/25] netfilter: bridge: " pablo
2012-06-11 14:43 ` [PATCH 23/25] netfilter: ipv4, defrag: " pablo
2012-06-11 14:44 ` [PATCH 24/25] netfilter: ipvs: " pablo
2012-06-11 14:44 ` [PATCH 25/25] netfilter: selinux: " pablo
2012-06-11 20:08 ` [PATCH 00/25] netfilter updates from net-next (upcoming 3.6) David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1339425841-24171-20-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).