From: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] netfilter: regard users as refcount for l4proto's per-net data
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:07:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1339668445-23848-4-git-send-email-gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339668445-23848-1-git-send-email-gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Now, nf_proto_net's users is confusing.
we should regard it as the refcount for l4proto's per-net data,
because maybe there are two l4protos use the same per-net data.
so increment pn->users when nf_conntrack_l4proto_register
success, and decrement it for nf_conntrack_l4_unregister case.
because nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv[4|6] don't use the same per-net
data,so we don't need to add a refcnt for their per-net data.
Signed-off-by: Gao feng <gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
index c9df1b4..63f9430 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto.c
@@ -39,16 +39,13 @@ static int
nf_ct_register_sysctl(struct net *net,
struct ctl_table_header **header,
const char *path,
- struct ctl_table *table,
- unsigned int *users)
+ struct ctl_table *table)
{
if (*header == NULL) {
*header = register_net_sysctl(net, path, table);
if (*header == NULL)
return -ENOMEM;
}
- if (users != NULL)
- (*users)++;
return 0;
}
@@ -58,7 +55,7 @@ nf_ct_unregister_sysctl(struct ctl_table_header **header,
struct ctl_table **table,
unsigned int *users)
{
- if (users != NULL && --*users > 0)
+ if (users != NULL && *users > 0)
return;
unregister_net_sysctl_table(*header);
@@ -191,8 +188,7 @@ static int nf_ct_l3proto_register_sysctl(struct net *net,
err = nf_ct_register_sysctl(net,
&in->ctl_table_header,
l3proto->ctl_table_path,
- in->ctl_table,
- NULL);
+ in->ctl_table);
if (err < 0) {
kfree(in->ctl_table);
@@ -330,20 +326,17 @@ static struct nf_proto_net *nf_ct_l4proto_net(struct net *net,
static
int nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(struct net *net,
+ struct nf_proto_net *pn,
struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
{
int err = 0;
- struct nf_proto_net *pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net, l4proto);
- if (pn == NULL)
- return 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
if (pn->ctl_table != NULL) {
err = nf_ct_register_sysctl(net,
&pn->ctl_table_header,
"net/netfilter",
- pn->ctl_table,
- &pn->users);
+ pn->ctl_table);
if (err < 0) {
if (!pn->users) {
kfree(pn->ctl_table);
@@ -357,8 +350,7 @@ int nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(struct net *net,
err = nf_ct_register_sysctl(net,
&pn->ctl_compat_header,
"net/ipv4/netfilter",
- pn->ctl_compat_table,
- NULL);
+ pn->ctl_compat_table);
if (err == 0)
goto out;
nf_ct_kfree_compat_sysctl_table(pn);
@@ -374,11 +366,9 @@ out:
static
void nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(struct net *net,
+ struct nf_proto_net *pn,
struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
{
- struct nf_proto_net *pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net, l4proto);
- if (pn == NULL)
- return;
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
if (pn->ctl_table_header != NULL)
nf_ct_unregister_sysctl(&pn->ctl_table_header,
@@ -391,8 +381,6 @@ void nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(struct net *net,
&pn->ctl_compat_table,
NULL);
#endif /* CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_PROC_COMPAT */
-#else
- pn->users--;
#endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
}
@@ -458,22 +446,33 @@ int nf_conntrack_l4proto_register(struct net *net,
struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
{
int ret = 0;
+
+ struct nf_proto_net *pn = NULL;
+
if (l4proto->init_net) {
ret = l4proto->init_net(net, l4proto->l3proto);
if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ goto out;
}
- ret = nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(net, l4proto);
+ pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net, l4proto);
+ if (pn == NULL)
+ goto out;
+
+ ret = nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
+ goto out;
if (net == &init_net) {
ret = nf_conntrack_l4proto_register_net(l4proto);
- if (ret < 0)
- nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, l4proto);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
+ goto out;
+ }
}
-
+ /* increase the nf_proto_net's refcnt */
+ pn->users++;
+out:
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_l4proto_register);
@@ -498,10 +497,18 @@ nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister_net(struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
void nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister(struct net *net,
struct nf_conntrack_l4proto *l4proto)
{
+ struct nf_proto_net *pn = NULL;
if (net == &init_net)
nf_conntrack_l4proto_unregister_net(l4proto);
- nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, l4proto);
+ pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net, l4proto);
+ if (pn == NULL)
+ return;
+
+ /* decrease the nf_proto_net's refcnt */
+ pn->users--;
+ nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net, pn, l4proto);
+
/* Remove all contrack entries for this protocol */
rtnl_lock();
nf_ct_iterate_cleanup(net, kill_l4proto, l4proto);
@@ -513,11 +520,14 @@ int nf_conntrack_proto_init(struct net *net)
{
unsigned int i;
int err;
+ struct nf_proto_net *pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net,
+ &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
err = nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic.init_net(net,
nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic.l3proto);
if (err < 0)
return err;
err = nf_ct_l4proto_register_sysctl(net,
+ pn,
&nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
if (err < 0)
return err;
@@ -527,13 +537,21 @@ int nf_conntrack_proto_init(struct net *net)
rcu_assign_pointer(nf_ct_l3protos[i],
&nf_conntrack_l3proto_generic);
}
+ /* increase generic proto's nf_proto_net refcnt */
+ pn->users++;
+
return 0;
}
void nf_conntrack_proto_fini(struct net *net)
{
unsigned int i;
+ struct nf_proto_net *pn = nf_ct_l4proto_net(net,
+ &nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
+ /* decrease generic proto's nf_proto_net refcnt */
+ pn->users--;
nf_ct_l4proto_unregister_sysctl(net,
+ pn,
&nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic);
if (net == &init_net) {
/* free l3proto protocol tables */
--
1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-14 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-14 10:07 [PATCH 01/10] netfilter: fix problem with proto register Gao feng
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 02/10] netfilter: add parameter proto for l4proto.init_net Gao feng
2012-06-14 17:59 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-15 1:38 ` Gao feng
2012-06-15 10:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-15 10:49 ` Gao feng
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 03/10] netfilter: add nf_ct_kfree_compat_sysctl_table to make codes clear Gao feng
2012-06-14 18:06 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-15 1:36 ` Gao feng
2012-06-15 10:08 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-14 10:07 ` Gao feng [this message]
2012-06-14 18:03 ` [PATCH 04/10] netfilter: regard users as refcount for l4proto's per-net data Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 05/10] netfilter: merge tcpv[4,6]_net_init into tcp_net_init Gao feng
2012-06-15 11:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-15 12:30 ` Gao feng
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 06/10] merge udpv[4,6]_net_init into udp_net_init Gao feng
2012-06-14 18:13 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 07/10] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_udplite[4,6] cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-14 18:17 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 08/10] netfilter: merge sctpv[4,6]_net_init into sctp_net_init Gao feng
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 09/10] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_generic cleanup Gao feng
2012-06-14 10:07 ` [PATCH 10/10] netfilter: nf_conntrack_l4proto_dccp[4,6] cleanup Gao feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1339668445-23848-4-git-send-email-gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=gaofeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).