From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cong Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ipv6: unify conntrack reassembly expire code with standard one Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:41:37 +0800 Message-ID: <1348126897.17345.11.camel@cr0> References: <1348023011-16195-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1348023011-16195-3-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev , Netfilter Developers , Herbert Xu , Michal =?UTF-8?Q?Kube=C4=8Dek?= , David Miller , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34413 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753074Ab2ITHmf (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:42:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2012-09-19 at 17:12 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Wed, 19 Sep 2012, Cong Wang wrote: > > [cut] > > With this patch applied, I can see ICMP Time Exceeded sent > > from the receiver when the sender sent out 3/4 fragmented > > IPv6 UPD packet. > > Typo "UPD" -> "UDP" > > If people want to redo the IPv6 UDP fragment tests, they can use my scapy > script, and comment out sending the last fragment: > https://github.com/netoptimizer/network-testing/blob/master/scapy/ipv6_fragment01.py > > Another thing, could you please "mark"/put the version of the patch in the > subject line, like: > > [PATCH V4 2/4] ipv6: ... > > This makes it easier, to follow on which version of the patch people are > replying to. > > With git send-email I think you have to do: > > git send-email --subject-prefix="PATCH V4" > > And with stg (stacked git) I usually do: > > stg mail --version "V4" --to netdev ... Thanks, Jesper! Unfortunately, git-send-email on F16 doesn't have --subject-prefix option (git-format-patch does), that is why I didn't add "V4" to every patch. Perhaps I should use git-format-patch + git-send-email next time.