From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Wensong Zhang <wensong@linux-vs.org>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Subject: [PATCH 12/15] ipvs: convert locks used in persistence engines
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:39:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364449184-26672-13-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364449184-26672-1-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au>
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Allow the readers to use RCU lock and for
PE module registrations use global mutex instead of
spinlock. All PE modules need to use synchronize_rcu
in their module exit handler.
Signed-off-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
Signed-off by: Hans Schillstrom <hans@schillstrom.com>
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
---
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c | 43 +++++++++++--------------------------
net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.c | 1 +
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c
index 5cf859c..5d9774c 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe.c
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@
/* IPVS pe list */
static LIST_HEAD(ip_vs_pe);
-/* lock for service table */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ip_vs_pe_lock);
+/* semaphore for IPVS PEs. */
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(ip_vs_pe_mutex);
/* Bind a service with a pe */
void ip_vs_bind_pe(struct ip_vs_service *svc, struct ip_vs_pe *pe)
@@ -36,9 +36,8 @@ struct ip_vs_pe *__ip_vs_pe_getbyname(const char *pe_name)
IP_VS_DBG(10, "%s(): pe_name \"%s\"\n", __func__,
pe_name);
- spin_lock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
-
- list_for_each_entry(pe, &ip_vs_pe, n_list) {
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(pe, &ip_vs_pe, n_list) {
/* Test and get the modules atomically */
if (pe->module &&
!try_module_get(pe->module)) {
@@ -47,14 +46,14 @@ struct ip_vs_pe *__ip_vs_pe_getbyname(const char *pe_name)
}
if (strcmp(pe_name, pe->name)==0) {
/* HIT */
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return pe;
}
if (pe->module)
module_put(pe->module);
}
+ rcu_read_unlock();
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
return NULL;
}
@@ -83,22 +82,13 @@ int register_ip_vs_pe(struct ip_vs_pe *pe)
/* increase the module use count */
ip_vs_use_count_inc();
- spin_lock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
-
- if (!list_empty(&pe->n_list)) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
- ip_vs_use_count_dec();
- pr_err("%s(): [%s] pe already linked\n",
- __func__, pe->name);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
+ mutex_lock(&ip_vs_pe_mutex);
/* Make sure that the pe with this name doesn't exist
* in the pe list.
*/
list_for_each_entry(tmp, &ip_vs_pe, n_list) {
if (strcmp(tmp->name, pe->name) == 0) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&ip_vs_pe_mutex);
ip_vs_use_count_dec();
pr_err("%s(): [%s] pe already existed "
"in the system\n", __func__, pe->name);
@@ -106,8 +96,8 @@ int register_ip_vs_pe(struct ip_vs_pe *pe)
}
}
/* Add it into the d-linked pe list */
- list_add(&pe->n_list, &ip_vs_pe);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
+ list_add_rcu(&pe->n_list, &ip_vs_pe);
+ mutex_unlock(&ip_vs_pe_mutex);
pr_info("[%s] pe registered.\n", pe->name);
@@ -118,17 +108,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(register_ip_vs_pe);
/* Unregister a pe from the pe list */
int unregister_ip_vs_pe(struct ip_vs_pe *pe)
{
- spin_lock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
- if (list_empty(&pe->n_list)) {
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
- pr_err("%s(): [%s] pe is not in the list. failed\n",
- __func__, pe->name);
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
+ mutex_lock(&ip_vs_pe_mutex);
/* Remove it from the d-linked pe list */
- list_del(&pe->n_list);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ip_vs_pe_lock);
+ list_del_rcu(&pe->n_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&ip_vs_pe_mutex);
/* decrease the module use count */
ip_vs_use_count_dec();
diff --git a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.c b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.c
index 12475ef..00cc024 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_pe_sip.c
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ static int __init ip_vs_sip_init(void)
static void __exit ip_vs_sip_cleanup(void)
{
unregister_ip_vs_pe(&ip_vs_sip_pe);
+ synchronize_rcu();
}
module_init(ip_vs_sip_init);
--
1.7.10.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-28 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-28 5:39 [PATCH 00/15 v3] IPVS optimizations (repost) Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 01/15] net: add skb_dst_set_noref_force Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 02/15] ipvs: avoid routing by TOS for real server Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 03/15] ipvs: prefer NETDEV_DOWN event to free cached dsts Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 04/15] ipvs: convert the IP_VS_XMIT macros to functions Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 05/15] ipvs: rename functions related to dst_cache reset Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 06/15] ipvs: no need to reroute anymore on DNAT over loopback Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 07/15] ipvs: do not use skb_share_check Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 08/15] ipvs: consolidate all dst checks on transmit in one place Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 09/15] ipvs: optimize dst usage for real server Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 10/15] ipvs: convert app locks Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 11/15] ipvs: remove rs_lock by using RCU Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 13/15] ipvs: convert connection locking Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 14/15] ipvs: reorder keys in connection structure Simon Horman
2013-03-28 5:39 ` [PATCH 15/15] ipvs: avoid kmem_cache_zalloc in ip_vs_conn_new Simon Horman
2013-03-28 9:04 ` [PATCH 00/15 v3] IPVS optimizations (repost) Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364449184-26672-13-git-send-email-horms@verge.net.au \
--to=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=wensong@linux-vs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).