From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Leblond Subject: Re: [nftables PATCH 0/5] misc fixes Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:12:05 +0200 Message-ID: <1370686325.5642.1.camel@ice-age.regit.org> References: <1370169512-23500-1-git-send-email-eric@regit.org> <20130606114310.GA9849@localhost> <20130606120255.GA10195@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-8Uc+RzRp3tPYzCWlYgRz" Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from ks28632.kimsufi.com ([91.121.96.152]:53030 "EHLO ks28632.kimsufi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751672Ab3FHKML (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Jun 2013 06:12:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20130606120255.GA10195@localhost> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --=-8Uc+RzRp3tPYzCWlYgRz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Le jeudi 06 juin 2013 =E0 14:02 +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso a =E9crit : > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 01:43:10PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > [...] > > > Patch 3 can also be discussed because it suppress something that was > > > done before in the code. > >=20 > > Can you point to the patch that changed that line of code, I'm lacking > > some context. >=20 > Oh, I think I get it. You mean that your patch is removing that line. > A quick tells me it's OK. OK, I've just pushed the patches to nftables tree. BR, -- Eric --=-8Uc+RzRp3tPYzCWlYgRz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBRswN1nxA7CdMWjzIRAp5HAJsERQ338nmDJiiVUqDxDSAjbtxb6gCeIghu 2Y5PIv/EPP4cJsO5WYfS6Us= =SZbl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-8Uc+RzRp3tPYzCWlYgRz--