From: Tomasz Bursztyka <tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com>
To: pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
Tomasz Bursztyka <tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 12/16] nft: Refactor rule deletion so it compares both cs structure
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 16:31:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1376055090-26551-13-git-send-email-tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376055090-26551-1-git-send-email-tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com>
Now that we parse properly, in one place and at once, the rule back into a
command structure, it's now easier to compare the rule from that command
structure when deleting.
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Bursztyka <tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com>
---
iptables/nft.c | 195 +++++++++++----------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 160 deletions(-)
diff --git a/iptables/nft.c b/iptables/nft.c
index 7171752..2cd2f77 100644
--- a/iptables/nft.c
+++ b/iptables/nft.c
@@ -1672,188 +1672,63 @@ next:
return 0;
}
-static int matches_howmany(struct xtables_rule_match *matches)
-{
- struct xtables_rule_match *matchp;
- int matches_ctr = 0;
-
- for (matchp = matches; matchp; matchp = matchp->next)
- matches_ctr++;
-
- return matches_ctr;
-}
-
static bool
-__find_match(struct nft_rule_expr *expr, struct xtables_rule_match *matches)
+compare_matches(struct xtables_rule_match *matches_1,
+ struct xtables_rule_match *matches_2)
{
- const char *matchname = nft_rule_expr_get_str(expr, NFT_EXPR_MT_NAME);
- /* Netlink aligns this match info, don't trust this length variable */
- const char *data = nft_rule_expr_get_str(expr, NFT_EXPR_MT_INFO);
- struct xtables_rule_match *matchp;
- bool found = false;
+ struct xtables_rule_match *mp_1;
+ struct xtables_rule_match *mp_2;
- for (matchp = matches; matchp; matchp = matchp->next) {
- struct xt_entry_match *m = matchp->match->m;
+ for (mp_1 = matches_1, mp_2 = matches_2;
+ mp_1 && mp_2; mp_1 = mp_1->next, mp_2 = mp_2->next) {
+ struct xt_entry_match *m_1 = mp_1->match->m;
+ struct xt_entry_match *m_2 = mp_2->match->m;
- if (strcmp(m->u.user.name, matchname) != 0) {
+ if (strcmp(m_1->u.user.name, m_2->u.user.name) != 0) {
DEBUGP("mismatching match name\n");
- continue;
+ return false;
}
- if (memcmp(data, m->data, m->u.user.match_size - sizeof(*m)) != 0) {
- DEBUGP("mismatch match data\n");
- continue;
+ if (m_1->u.user.match_size != m_2->u.user.match_size) {
+ DEBUGP("mismatching match size\n");
+ return false;
}
- found = true;
- break;
- }
-
- return found;
-}
-
-static bool find_matches(struct xtables_rule_match *matches, struct nft_rule *r)
-{
- struct nft_rule_expr_iter *iter;
- struct nft_rule_expr *expr;
- int kernel_matches = 0;
-
- iter = nft_rule_expr_iter_create(r);
- if (iter == NULL)
- return false;
- expr = nft_rule_expr_iter_next(iter);
- while (expr != NULL) {
- const char *name =
- nft_rule_expr_get_str(expr, NFT_RULE_EXPR_ATTR_NAME);
-
- if (strcmp(name, "match") == 0) {
- if (!__find_match(expr, matches))
- return false;
-
- kernel_matches++;
+ if (memcmp(m_1->data, m_2->data,
+ m_1->u.user.match_size - sizeof(*m_1)) != 0) {
+ DEBUGP("mismatch match data\n");
+ return false;
}
- expr = nft_rule_expr_iter_next(iter);
}
- nft_rule_expr_iter_destroy(iter);
- /* same number of matches? */
- if (matches_howmany(matches) != kernel_matches)
- return false;
-
- return true;
-}
-
-static bool __find_target(struct nft_rule_expr *expr, struct xt_entry_target *t)
-{
- size_t len;
- const char *tgname = nft_rule_expr_get_str(expr, NFT_EXPR_TG_NAME);
- /* Netlink aligns this target info, don't trust this length variable */
- const char *data = nft_rule_expr_get(expr, NFT_EXPR_TG_INFO, &len);
-
- if (strcmp(t->u.user.name, tgname) != 0) {
- DEBUGP("mismatching target name\n");
+ /* Both cursor should be NULL */
+ if (mp_1 != mp_2) {
+ DEBUGP("mismatch matches amount\n");
return false;
}
- if (memcmp(data, t->data, t->u.user.target_size - sizeof(*t)) != 0)
- return false;
-
return true;
}
-static int targets_howmany(struct xtables_target *target)
-{
- return target != NULL ? 1 : 0;
-}
-
static bool
-find_target(struct xtables_target *target, struct nft_rule *r)
+compare_targets(struct xtables_target *target_1,
+ struct xtables_target *target_2)
{
- struct nft_rule_expr_iter *iter;
- struct nft_rule_expr *expr;
- int kernel_targets = 0;
-
- /* Special case: we use native immediate expressions to emulated
- * standard targets. Also, we don't want to crash with no targets.
- */
- if (target == NULL || strcmp(target->name, "standard") == 0)
+ if (target_1 == NULL && target_2 == NULL)
return true;
- iter = nft_rule_expr_iter_create(r);
- if (iter == NULL)
+ if ((target_1 == NULL && target_2 != NULL) ||
+ (target_1 != NULL && target_2 == NULL))
return false;
- expr = nft_rule_expr_iter_next(iter);
- while (expr != NULL) {
- const char *name =
- nft_rule_expr_get_str(expr, NFT_RULE_EXPR_ATTR_NAME);
-
- if (strcmp(name, "target") == 0) {
- /* we may support several targets in the future */
- if (!__find_target(expr, target->t))
- return false;
-
- kernel_targets++;
- }
- expr = nft_rule_expr_iter_next(iter);
- }
- nft_rule_expr_iter_destroy(iter);
-
- /* same number of targets? */
- if (targets_howmany(target) != kernel_targets) {
- DEBUGP("kernel targets is %d but we passed %d\n",
- kernel_targets, targets_howmany(target));
+ if (strcmp(target_1->t->u.user.name, target_2->t->u.user.name) != 0)
return false;
- }
- return true;
-}
-
-static bool
-find_immediate(struct nft_rule *r, const char *jumpto)
-{
- struct nft_rule_expr_iter *iter;
- struct nft_rule_expr *expr;
-
- iter = nft_rule_expr_iter_create(r);
- if (iter == NULL)
+ if (memcmp(target_1->t->data, target_2->t->data,
+ target_1->t->u.user.target_size -
+ sizeof(*target_1->t)) != 0)
return false;
- expr = nft_rule_expr_iter_next(iter);
- while (expr != NULL) {
- const char *name =
- nft_rule_expr_get_str(expr, NFT_RULE_EXPR_ATTR_NAME);
-
- if (strcmp(name, "immediate") == 0) {
- int verdict = nft_rule_expr_get_u32(expr, NFT_EXPR_IMM_VERDICT);
- const char *verdict_name = NULL;
-
- /* No target specified but immediate shows up, this
- * is not the rule we are looking for.
- */
- if (strlen(jumpto) == 0)
- return false;
-
- switch(verdict) {
- case NF_ACCEPT:
- verdict_name = "ACCEPT";
- break;
- case NF_DROP:
- verdict_name = "DROP";
- break;
- case NFT_RETURN:
- verdict_name = "RETURN";
- break;
- }
-
- /* Standard target? */
- if (verdict_name && strcmp(jumpto, verdict_name) != 0)
- return false;
- }
- expr = nft_rule_expr_iter_next(iter);
- }
- nft_rule_expr_iter_destroy(iter);
-
return true;
}
@@ -1932,18 +1807,18 @@ nft_rule_find(struct nft_rule_list *list, const char *chain, const char *table,
if (!ops->is_same(cs, &this))
goto next;
- if (!find_matches(cs->matches, r)) {
- DEBUGP("matches not found\n");
+ if (!compare_matches(cs->matches, this.matches)) {
+ DEBUGP("Different matches\n");
goto next;
}
- if (!find_target(cs->target, r)) {
- DEBUGP("target not found\n");
+ if (!compare_targets(cs->target, this.target)) {
+ DEBUGP("Different target\n");
goto next;
}
- if (!find_immediate(r, cs->jumpto)) {
- DEBUGP("immediate not found\n");
+ if (strcmp(cs->jumpto, this.jumpto) != 0) {
+ DEBUGP("Different verdict\n");
goto next;
}
--
1.8.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-09 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-09 13:31 [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 00/16] Xtables extensions: full support (pure nft or compat layer) Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 01/16] xtables: Add support for injecting xtables target into nft rule Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 02/16] xtables: add support for injecting xtables matches " Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 03/16] nft: Add nft expressions translation engine as a library Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 04/16] nft: Integrate nft translator engine in current core Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 21:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-08-12 7:15 ` Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 05/16] nft: Manage xtables target parsing through translation tree Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 06/16] nft: Manage xtables matches through nft " Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 07/16] nft: Add support for xtables extensions callback to change cs Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 08/16] xtables: Add support for registering nft translation function for target Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 09/16] xtables: Add support for registering nft translation function for match Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 10/16] nft: Register all relevant xtables extensions into translation tree Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 11/16] nft: Refactor firewall printing so it reuses already parsed cs struct Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 21:51 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-08-12 7:54 ` Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-12 9:30 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-08-12 10:54 ` Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` Tomasz Bursztyka [this message]
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 13/16] xtables: nft: Complete refactoring on how rules are saved Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 14/16] xtables: Support pure nft expressions for DNAT extension Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 21:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-08-12 7:42 ` Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 15/16] nft: Add a function to reset the counters of an existing rule Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 22:00 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-08-09 13:31 ` [iptables-nftables RFC v3 PATCH 16/16] xtables: Support -Z options for a given rule number Tomasz Bursztyka
2013-08-09 22:02 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2013-08-12 7:45 ` Tomasz Bursztyka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1376055090-26551-13-git-send-email-tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com \
--to=tomasz.bursztyka@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).