Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Konstantin Meskhidze (A)" <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>, <gnoack3000@gmail.com>,
	<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>, <yusongping@huawei.com>,
	<artem.kuzin@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 05/13] landlock: Refactor merge/inherit_ruleset functions
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 14:46:38 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13792f4e-3df7-9cc0-734a-285f95dbe7ca@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b2f2e0f-0a95-ef87-7eb2-286e75a62e2c@digikod.net>



4/16/2023 7:09 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
> 
> On 23/03/2023 09:52, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
>> Refactor merge_ruleset() and inherit_ruleset() functions to support
>> new rule types. This patch adds merge_tree() and inherit_tree()
>> helpers. They use a specific ruleset's red-black tree according to
>> a key type argument.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> 
>> Changes since v9:
>> * None
>> 
>> Changes since v8:
>> * Refactors commit message.
>> * Minor fixes.
>> 
>> Changes since v7:
>> * Adds missed lockdep_assert_held it inherit_tree() and merge_tree().
>> * Fixes comment.
>> 
>> Changes since v6:
>> * Refactors merge_ruleset() and inherit_ruleset() functions to support
>>    new rule types.
>> * Renames tree_merge() to merge_tree() (and reorder arguments), and
>>    tree_copy() to inherit_tree().
>> 
>> Changes since v5:
>> * Refactors some logic errors.
>> * Formats code with clang-format-14.
>> 
>> Changes since v4:
>> * None
>> 
>> ---
>>   security/landlock/ruleset.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>   1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
>> index d3859d5e7306..2579c9bbedbc 100644
>> --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
>> +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
>> @@ -302,36 +302,22 @@ static void put_hierarchy(struct landlock_hierarchy *hierarchy)
>>   	}
>>   }
>> 
>> -static int merge_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const dst,
>> -			 struct landlock_ruleset *const src)
>> +static int merge_tree(struct landlock_ruleset *const dst,
>> +		      struct landlock_ruleset *const src,
>> +		      const enum landlock_key_type key_type)
>>   {
>>   	struct landlock_rule *walker_rule, *next_rule;
>>   	struct rb_root *src_root;
>>   	int err = 0;
>> 
>>   	might_sleep();
>> -	/* Should already be checked by landlock_merge_ruleset() */
>> -	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!src))
>> -		return 0;
>> -	/* Only merge into a domain. */
>> -	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dst || !dst->hierarchy))
>> -		return -EINVAL;
>> +	lockdep_assert_held(&dst->lock);
>> +	lockdep_assert_held(&src->lock);
>> 
>> -	src_root = get_root(src, LANDLOCK_KEY_INODE);
>> +	src_root = get_root(src, key_type);
>>   	if (IS_ERR(src_root))
>>   		return PTR_ERR(src_root);
>> 
>> -	/* Locks @dst first because we are its only owner. */
>> -	mutex_lock(&dst->lock);
>> -	mutex_lock_nested(&src->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
>> -
>> -	/* Stacks the new layer. */
>> -	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(src->num_layers != 1 || dst->num_layers < 1)) {
>> -		err = -EINVAL;
>> -		goto out_unlock;
>> -	}
>> -	dst->access_masks[dst->num_layers - 1] = src->access_masks[0];
>> -
>>   	/* Merges the @src tree. */
>>   	rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(walker_rule, next_rule, src_root,
>>   					     node) {
>> @@ -340,23 +326,52 @@ static int merge_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const dst,
>>   		} };
>>   		const struct landlock_id id = {
>>   			.key = walker_rule->key,
>> -			.type = LANDLOCK_KEY_INODE,
>> +			.type = key_type,
>>   		};
>> 
>>   		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(walker_rule->num_layers != 1)) {
>>   			err = -EINVAL;
>> -			goto out_unlock;
> 
> This should be replaced with `return -EINVAL;` and the `{` `}` after the
> if condition are not needed anymore.
> 
   Ok. Will be changed.
> 
>>   		}
>>   		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(walker_rule->layers[0].level != 0)) {
>>   			err = -EINVAL;
>> -			goto out_unlock;
> 
> ditto

   Got it.
> 
>>   		}
>>   		layers[0].access = walker_rule->layers[0].access;
>> 
>>   		err = insert_rule(dst, id, &layers, ARRAY_SIZE(layers));
>>   		if (err)
>> -			goto out_unlock;
>> +			return err;
>> +	}
>> +	return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int merge_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const dst,
>> +			 struct landlock_ruleset *const src)
>> +{
>> +	int err = 0;
>> +
>> +	might_sleep();
>> +	/* Should already be checked by landlock_merge_ruleset() */
>> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!src))
>> +		return 0;
>> +	/* Only merge into a domain. */
>> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dst || !dst->hierarchy))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	/* Locks @dst first because we are its only owner. */
>> +	mutex_lock(&dst->lock);
>> +	mutex_lock_nested(&src->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
>> +
>> +	/* Stacks the new layer. */
>> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(src->num_layers != 1 || dst->num_layers < 1)) {
>> +		err = -EINVAL;
>> +		goto out_unlock;
>>   	}
>> +	dst->access_masks[dst->num_layers - 1] = src->access_masks[0];
>> +
>> +	/* Merges the @src inode tree. */
>> +	err = merge_tree(dst, src, LANDLOCK_KEY_INODE);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		goto out_unlock;
>> 
>>   out_unlock:
>>   	mutex_unlock(&src->lock);
>> @@ -364,43 +379,64 @@ static int merge_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const dst,
>>   	return err;
>>   }
>> 
>> -static int inherit_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const parent,
>> -			   struct landlock_ruleset *const child)
>> +static int inherit_tree(struct landlock_ruleset *const parent,
>> +			struct landlock_ruleset *const child,
>> +			const enum landlock_key_type key_type)
>>   {
>>   	struct landlock_rule *walker_rule, *next_rule;
>>   	struct rb_root *parent_root;
>>   	int err = 0;
>> 
>>   	might_sleep();
>> -	if (!parent)
>> -		return 0;
>> +	lockdep_assert_held(&parent->lock);
>> +	lockdep_assert_held(&child->lock);
>> 
>> -	parent_root = get_root(parent, LANDLOCK_KEY_INODE);
>> +	parent_root = get_root(parent, key_type);
>>   	if (IS_ERR(parent_root))
>>   		return PTR_ERR(parent_root);
>> 
>> -	/* Locks @child first because we are its only owner. */
>> -	mutex_lock(&child->lock);
>> -	mutex_lock_nested(&parent->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
>> -
>> -	/* Copies the @parent tree. */
>> +	/* Copies the @parent inode or network tree. */
>>   	rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(walker_rule, next_rule,
>>   					     parent_root, node) {
>>   		const struct landlock_id id = {
>>   			.key = walker_rule->key,
>> -			.type = LANDLOCK_KEY_INODE,
>> +			.type = key_type,
>>   		};
>> +
>>   		err = insert_rule(child, id, &walker_rule->layers,
>>   				  walker_rule->num_layers);
>>   		if (err)
>> -			goto out_unlock;
>> +			return err;
>>   	}
>> +	return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int inherit_ruleset(struct landlock_ruleset *const parent,
>> +			   struct landlock_ruleset *const child)
>> +{
>> +	int err = 0;
>> +
>> +	might_sleep();
>> +	if (!parent)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	/* Locks @child first because we are its only owner. */
>> +	mutex_lock(&child->lock);
>> +	mutex_lock_nested(&parent->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
>> +
>> +	/* Copies the @parent inode tree. */
>> +	err = inherit_tree(parent, child, LANDLOCK_KEY_INODE);
>> +	if (err)
>> +		goto out_unlock;
>> 
>>   	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(child->num_layers <= parent->num_layers)) {
>>   		err = -EINVAL;
>>   		goto out_unlock;
>>   	}
>> -	/* Copies the parent layer stack and leaves a space for the new layer. */
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Copies the parent layer stack and leaves a space
>> +	 * for the new layer.
>> +	 */
>>   	memcpy(child->access_masks, parent->access_masks,
>>   	       flex_array_size(parent, access_masks, parent->num_layers));
>> 
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>> 
> .

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-20 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-23  8:52 [PATCH v10 00/13] Network support for Landlock Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 01/13] landlock: Make ruleset's access masks more generic Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 02/13] landlock: Allow filesystem layout changes for domains without such rule type Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-04-16 16:09   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-20 11:42     ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-04-20 17:32       ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-21  7:54         ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 03/13] landlock: Remove unnecessary inlining Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-04-16 16:09   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-20 11:45     ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 04/13] landlock: Refactor landlock_find_rule/insert_rule Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 05/13] landlock: Refactor merge/inherit_ruleset functions Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-04-16 16:09   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-20 11:46     ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A) [this message]
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 06/13] landlock: Move and rename layer helpers Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 07/13] landlock: Refactor " Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-04-16 16:11   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-20 16:05     ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 08/13] landlock: Refactor landlock_add_rule() syscall Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 09/13] landlock: Add network rules and TCP hooks support Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-03-31 17:24   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-03-31 17:30     ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-04  9:33       ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-04-04  9:31     ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-04-04 16:42       ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-04 17:02         ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-05 19:19           ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-04-06 10:31             ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-06 10:37               ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-04-05 17:42         ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-04-06 10:28           ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-06 10:30             ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-04-16 16:11   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-21  9:39     ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-04-26 14:15       ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 10/13] selftests/landlock: Share enforce_ruleset() Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-04-16 16:12   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-20 16:06     ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 11/13] selftests/landlock: Add 10 new test suites dedicated to network Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-04-16 16:13   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-21 10:02     ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-04-26 19:10       ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 12/13] samples/landlock: Add network demo Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-04-16 16:13   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-21 10:04     ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)
2023-03-23  8:52 ` [PATCH v10 13/13] landlock: Document Landlock's network support Konstantin Meskhidze
2023-04-16 16:13   ` Mickaël Salaün
2023-04-21 10:07     ` Konstantin Meskhidze (A)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13792f4e-3df7-9cc0-734a-285f95dbe7ca@huawei.com \
    --to=konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com \
    --cc=artem.kuzin@huawei.com \
    --cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=yusongping@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox