From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH V2] netfilter: ctnetlink: force null nat binding on insert
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 12:15:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1392549343-7145-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
Quoting Andrey Vagin:
When a conntrack is created by kernel, it is initialized (sets
IPS_{DST,SRC}_NAT_DONE_BIT bits in nf_nat_setup_info) and only then it
is added in hashes (__nf_conntrack_hash_insert), so one conntract
can't be initialized from a few threads concurrently.
ctnetlink can add an uninitialized conntrack (w/o
IPS_{DST,SRC}_NAT_DONE_BIT) in hashes, then a few threads can look up
this conntrack and start initialize it concurrently. It's dangerous,
because BUG can be triggered from nf_nat_setup_info.
Fix this race by always setting up nat, even if no CTA_NAT_ attribute
was requested before inserting the ct into the hash table.
In absence of CTA_NAT_ attribute, a null binding is created.
This alters current behaviour:
Before this patch, the first packet matching the newly injected
conntrack would be run through the nat table since nf_nat_initialized()
returns false. IOW, this forces ctnetlink users to specify the desired
nat transformation on ct creation time.
Reported-By: Andrey Vagin <avagin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
Change since v1: fix OOPS when L3 conntrack module is not loaded.
Caused by nf_nat_setup_info -> get_unique_tuple() which will
call __nf_nat_l4proto_find() but thats only possible when l3 module
is loaded, else null-ptr deref.
For the non-ctnetlink case the l3 module must be there, else we cannot
end up in this function. Thus I did not want to add tests there
and instead added a pre-check when adding null binding via ctnetlink.
Not very nice, perhaps someone has better idea
[ look in patch for comment in nfnetlink_attach_null_binding() ]
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 37 +++++++++++---------------
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index bb322d0..40299a6 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -1310,27 +1310,24 @@ ctnetlink_change_status(struct nf_conn *ct, const struct nlattr * const cda[])
}
static int
-ctnetlink_change_nat(struct nf_conn *ct, const struct nlattr * const cda[])
+ctnetlink_setup_nat(struct nf_conn *ct, const struct nlattr * const cda[])
{
#ifdef CONFIG_NF_NAT_NEEDED
int ret;
- if (cda[CTA_NAT_DST]) {
- ret = ctnetlink_parse_nat_setup(ct,
- NF_NAT_MANIP_DST,
- cda[CTA_NAT_DST]);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
- }
- if (cda[CTA_NAT_SRC]) {
- ret = ctnetlink_parse_nat_setup(ct,
- NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC,
- cda[CTA_NAT_SRC]);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
- }
- return 0;
+ ret = ctnetlink_parse_nat_setup(ct,
+ NF_NAT_MANIP_DST,
+ cda[CTA_NAT_DST]);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = ctnetlink_parse_nat_setup(ct,
+ NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC,
+ cda[CTA_NAT_SRC]);
+ return ret;
#else
+ if (!cda[CTA_NAT_DST] && !cda[CTA_NAT_SRC])
+ return 0;
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
#endif
}
@@ -1659,11 +1656,9 @@ ctnetlink_create_conntrack(struct net *net, u16 zone,
goto err2;
}
- if (cda[CTA_NAT_SRC] || cda[CTA_NAT_DST]) {
- err = ctnetlink_change_nat(ct, cda);
- if (err < 0)
- goto err2;
- }
+ err = ctnetlink_setup_nat(ct, cda);
+ if (err < 0)
+ goto err2;
nf_ct_acct_ext_add(ct, GFP_ATOMIC);
nf_ct_tstamp_ext_add(ct, GFP_ATOMIC);
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
index d3f5cd6..c8ba395 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
@@ -432,15 +432,15 @@ nf_nat_setup_info(struct nf_conn *ct,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(nf_nat_setup_info);
-unsigned int
-nf_nat_alloc_null_binding(struct nf_conn *ct, unsigned int hooknum)
+static unsigned int
+__nf_nat_alloc_null_binding(struct nf_conn *ct, enum nf_nat_manip_type manip)
{
/* Force range to this IP; let proto decide mapping for
* per-proto parts (hence not IP_NAT_RANGE_PROTO_SPECIFIED).
* Use reply in case it's already been mangled (eg local packet).
*/
union nf_inet_addr ip =
- (HOOK2MANIP(hooknum) == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC ?
+ (manip == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC ?
ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple.dst.u3 :
ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple.src.u3);
struct nf_nat_range range = {
@@ -448,7 +448,13 @@ nf_nat_alloc_null_binding(struct nf_conn *ct, unsigned int hooknum)
.min_addr = ip,
.max_addr = ip,
};
- return nf_nat_setup_info(ct, &range, HOOK2MANIP(hooknum));
+ return nf_nat_setup_info(ct, &range, manip);
+}
+
+unsigned int
+nf_nat_alloc_null_binding(struct nf_conn *ct, unsigned int hooknum)
+{
+ return __nf_nat_alloc_null_binding(ct, HOOK2MANIP(hooknum));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_nat_alloc_null_binding);
@@ -734,6 +740,33 @@ out:
}
static int
+nfnetlink_attach_null_binding(struct nf_conn *ct,
+ enum nf_nat_manip_type manip)
+{
+ int ret = -EAGAIN;
+ bool can_alloc;
+
+ /* This looks bogus, but its important.
+ *
+ * We cannot be sure that L3 NAT is available.
+ *
+ * If it is not, we will oops in nf_nat_setup_info when we try
+ * to fetch the l4 nat protocol (which would be on top of the l3 one).
+ *
+ * Normally nf_nat_setup_info cannot be called without L3 nat
+ * available, but this function is invoked from ctnetlink.
+ */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+
+ can_alloc = !!__nf_nat_l3proto_find(nf_ct_l3num(ct));
+ if (can_alloc)
+ ret = __nf_nat_alloc_null_binding(ct, manip);
+
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int
nfnetlink_parse_nat_setup(struct nf_conn *ct,
enum nf_nat_manip_type manip,
const struct nlattr *attr)
@@ -741,11 +774,17 @@ nfnetlink_parse_nat_setup(struct nf_conn *ct,
struct nf_nat_range range;
int err;
+ /* should not happen, restricted to creating new conntracks
+ * via ctnetlink */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nf_nat_initialized(ct, manip)))
+ return -EEXIST;
+
+ if (attr == NULL)
+ return nfnetlink_attach_null_binding(ct, manip);
+
err = nfnetlink_parse_nat(attr, ct, &range);
if (err < 0)
return err;
- if (nf_nat_initialized(ct, manip))
- return -EEXIST;
return nf_nat_setup_info(ct, &range, manip);
}
--
1.8.1.5
next reply other threads:[~2014-02-16 11:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-16 11:15 Florian Westphal [this message]
2014-02-17 10:37 ` [PATCH V2] netfilter: ctnetlink: force null nat binding on insert Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-02-17 10:45 ` Florian Westphal
2014-02-17 10:58 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-02-17 11:15 ` Florian Westphal
2014-02-17 13:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2014-02-17 13:32 ` Florian Westphal
2014-02-18 1:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1392549343-7145-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).