* [PATCH] netfilter: fix bad checksum on IPv6 when NAT is performed
@ 2015-10-06 14:23 Maxime Bizon
2015-10-08 20:19 ` Maxime Bizon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Bizon @ 2015-10-06 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: davem, kaber, pablo, netfilter-devel
With this setup:
* non IPv6 checksumming capable network hardware
* GRO off
* IPv6 SNAT
I get this when I receive an UDPv6 reply: "<unknown>: hw csum failure"
Call trace:
* nf_ip6_checksum() calls __skb_checksum_complete()
* nf_nat_ipv6_csum_update() & nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt()
* __udp6_lib_rcv() => udp6_csum_init()
* __skb_checksum_validate_complete() "fastpath" fails because
skb->csum is incorrect.
* udpv6_recvmsg() => skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_msg()
The last call computes a valid checksum despite CHECKSUM_COMPLETE and
triggers the warning.
When we perform NAT on IPv4, we also update the IPv4 checksum, so
there is no side effect on skb->csum (since the csum over a valid IPv4
header area is zero).
But IPv6 doesn't have such header checksum, so when performing NAT we need to
update skb->csum.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
---
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
index 70fbaed..e9917d74 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ static bool nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb,
enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype)
{
struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h;
+ const __be32 *to;
+ __be32 *from;
__be16 frag_off;
int hdroff;
u8 nexthdr;
@@ -100,11 +102,24 @@ static bool nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb,
target, maniptype))
return false;
manip_addr:
- if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
- ipv6h->saddr = target->src.u3.in6;
- else
- ipv6h->daddr = target->dst.u3.in6;
+ if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC) {
+ from = ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32;
+ to = target->src.u3.in6.s6_addr32;
+ } else {
+ from = ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32;
+ to = target->src.u3.in6.s6_addr32;
+ }
+
+ if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE) {
+ __be32 diff[] = {
+ ~from[0], ~from[1], ~from[2], ~from[3],
+ to[0], to[1], to[2], to[3],
+ };
+
+ skb->csum = ~csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff), ~skb->csum);
+ }
+ memcpy(from, to, sizeof (struct in6_addr));
return true;
}
--
1.9.1
--
Maxime
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: fix bad checksum on IPv6 when NAT is performed
2015-10-06 14:23 [PATCH] netfilter: fix bad checksum on IPv6 when NAT is performed Maxime Bizon
@ 2015-10-08 20:19 ` Maxime Bizon
2015-10-08 20:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Maxime Bizon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Bizon @ 2015-10-08 20:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: davem, kaber, pablo, netfilter-devel
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 16:23 +0200, Maxime Bizon wrote:
> + if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC) {
> + from = ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32;
> + to = target->src.u3.in6.s6_addr32;
> + } else {
> + from = ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32;
> + to = target->src.u3.in6.s6_addr32;
> + }
stupid copy & paste error here, will send v2
--
Maxime
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] netfilter: fix bad checksum on IPv6 when NAT is performed
2015-10-08 20:19 ` Maxime Bizon
@ 2015-10-08 20:26 ` Maxime Bizon
2015-10-08 21:09 ` Tom Herbert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Bizon @ 2015-10-08 20:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: davem, kaber, pablo, netfilter-devel
With this setup:
* non IPv6 checksumming capable network hardware
* GRO off
* IPv6 SNAT
I get this when I receive an UDPv6 reply: "<unknown>: hw csum failure"
Call trace:
* nf_ip6_checksum() calls __skb_checksum_complete()
* nf_nat_ipv6_csum_update() & nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt()
* __udp6_lib_rcv() => udp6_csum_init()
* __skb_checksum_validate_complete() "fastpath" fails because
skb->csum is incorrect.
* udpv6_recvmsg() => skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_msg()
The last call computes a valid checksum despite CHECKSUM_COMPLETE and
triggers the warning.
When we perform NAT on IPv4, we also update the IPv4 checksum, so
there is no side effect on skb->csum (since the csum over a valid IPv4
header area was already zero).
But IPv6 doesn't have such checksum, so when performing NAT we need to
update skb->csum.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
---
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
index 70fbaed..e44af9c 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ static bool nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb,
enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype)
{
struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h;
+ const __be32 *to;
+ __be32 *from;
__be16 frag_off;
int hdroff;
u8 nexthdr;
@@ -100,11 +102,24 @@ static bool nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb,
target, maniptype))
return false;
manip_addr:
- if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
- ipv6h->saddr = target->src.u3.in6;
- else
- ipv6h->daddr = target->dst.u3.in6;
+ if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC) {
+ from = ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32;
+ to = target->src.u3.in6.s6_addr32;
+ } else {
+ from = ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32;
+ to = target->dst.u3.in6.s6_addr32;
+ }
+
+ if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE) {
+ __be32 diff[] = {
+ ~from[0], ~from[1], ~from[2], ~from[3],
+ to[0], to[1], to[2], to[3],
+ };
+
+ skb->csum = ~csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff), ~skb->csum);
+ }
+ memcpy(from, to, sizeof (struct in6_addr));
return true;
}
--
1.9.1
--
Maxime
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: fix bad checksum on IPv6 when NAT is performed
2015-10-08 20:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Maxime Bizon
@ 2015-10-08 21:09 ` Tom Herbert
2015-10-08 21:26 ` Maxime Bizon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Herbert @ 2015-10-08 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mbizon; +Cc: netdev, davem, kaber, pablo, netfilter-devel
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr> wrote:
>
> With this setup:
>
> * non IPv6 checksumming capable network hardware
> * GRO off
> * IPv6 SNAT
>
> I get this when I receive an UDPv6 reply: "<unknown>: hw csum failure"
>
> Call trace:
>
> * nf_ip6_checksum() calls __skb_checksum_complete()
> * nf_nat_ipv6_csum_update() & nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt()
> * __udp6_lib_rcv() => udp6_csum_init()
> * __skb_checksum_validate_complete() "fastpath" fails because
> skb->csum is incorrect.
> * udpv6_recvmsg() => skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_msg()
>
> The last call computes a valid checksum despite CHECKSUM_COMPLETE and
> triggers the warning.
>
> When we perform NAT on IPv4, we also update the IPv4 checksum, so
> there is no side effect on skb->csum (since the csum over a valid IPv4
> header area was already zero).
>
> But IPv6 doesn't have such checksum, so when performing NAT we need to
> update skb->csum.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr>
> ---
> net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
> index 70fbaed..e44af9c 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_l3proto_ipv6.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ static bool nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb,
> enum nf_nat_manip_type maniptype)
> {
> struct ipv6hdr *ipv6h;
> + const __be32 *to;
> + __be32 *from;
> __be16 frag_off;
> int hdroff;
> u8 nexthdr;
> @@ -100,11 +102,24 @@ static bool nf_nat_ipv6_manip_pkt(struct sk_buff *skb,
> target, maniptype))
> return false;
> manip_addr:
> - if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC)
> - ipv6h->saddr = target->src.u3.in6;
> - else
> - ipv6h->daddr = target->dst.u3.in6;
> + if (maniptype == NF_NAT_MANIP_SRC) {
> + from = ipv6h->saddr.s6_addr32;
> + to = target->src.u3.in6.s6_addr32;
> + } else {
> + from = ipv6h->daddr.s6_addr32;
> + to = target->dst.u3.in6.s6_addr32;
> + }
> +
> + if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_COMPLETE) {
> + __be32 diff[] = {
> + ~from[0], ~from[1], ~from[2], ~from[3],
> + to[0], to[1], to[2], to[3],
> + };
> +
> + skb->csum = ~csum_partial(diff, sizeof(diff), ~skb->csum);
> + }
>
I think inet_proto_csum_replace16 should be called here.
> + memcpy(from, to, sizeof (struct in6_addr));
> return true;
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> --
> Maxime
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: fix bad checksum on IPv6 when NAT is performed
2015-10-08 21:09 ` Tom Herbert
@ 2015-10-08 21:26 ` Maxime Bizon
2015-10-08 22:11 ` Tom Herbert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Bizon @ 2015-10-08 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Herbert; +Cc: netdev, davem, kaber, pablo, netfilter-devel
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 14:09 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
> I think inet_proto_csum_replace16 should be called here.
inet_proto_csum_replace16() wants a non NULL checksum pointer to update,
and there is no such thing here.
I could pass a dummy value, but inet_proto_csum_replace16() will do
twice more work for nothing
or I could modify inet_proto_csum_replace16() to allow a NULL sum
argument.
--
Maxime
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] netfilter: fix bad checksum on IPv6 when NAT is performed
2015-10-08 21:26 ` Maxime Bizon
@ 2015-10-08 22:11 ` Tom Herbert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Tom Herbert @ 2015-10-08 22:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mbizon; +Cc: netdev, davem, kaber, pablo, netfilter-devel
On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Maxime Bizon <mbizon@freebox.fr> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 14:09 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>
>> I think inet_proto_csum_replace16 should be called here.
>
> inet_proto_csum_replace16() wants a non NULL checksum pointer to update,
> and there is no such thing here.
>
> I could pass a dummy value, but inet_proto_csum_replace16() will do
> twice more work for nothing
>
> or I could modify inet_proto_csum_replace16() to allow a NULL sum
> argument.
>
If I am reading the code correctly, it looks like
inet_proto_csum_replace16 is called from
{tcp,dccp,tcp.udp,udplite}_manip_pkt via l3proto->csum_update which is
a call to nf_nat_ipv6_csum_update for IPv6. So for these protocols
when the transport checksum is updated skb->csum is also correctly
updated. For other protocols or when UDP checksum is zero or for
fragments-- I don't see where skb->csum is being properly updated.
This potentially seems to be a major bug.
I would suggest:
1) Modify the inet_proto_csum_replace* routines to check for NULL
check pointer and and only write it when non-NULL
2) Call l3proto->csum_update from unknown_manip_pkt with check == NULL
3) In udp_manip_pkt call l3proto->csum_update with check = NULL when
UDP checksum is zero
4) For IPv6 fragments call l3proto->csum_update with check = NULL
Tom
> --
> Maxime
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-08 22:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-06 14:23 [PATCH] netfilter: fix bad checksum on IPv6 when NAT is performed Maxime Bizon
2015-10-08 20:19 ` Maxime Bizon
2015-10-08 20:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Maxime Bizon
2015-10-08 21:09 ` Tom Herbert
2015-10-08 21:26 ` Maxime Bizon
2015-10-08 22:11 ` Tom Herbert
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).