From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: [PATCH nf] netfilter: conntrack: resched in nf_ct_iterate_cleanup
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 18:30:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1449682209-20330-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de> (raw)
Ulrich reports soft lockup with following (shortened) callchain:
NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s!
__netif_receive_skb_core+0x6e4/0x774
process_backlog+0x94/0x160
net_rx_action+0x88/0x178
call_do_softirq+0x24/0x3c
do_softirq+0x54/0x6c
__local_bh_enable_ip+0x7c/0xbc
nf_ct_iterate_cleanup+0x11c/0x22c [nf_conntrack]
masq_inet_event+0x20/0x30 [nf_nat_masquerade_ipv6]
atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x1c/0x2c
ipv6_del_addr+0x1bc/0x220 [ipv6]
Problem is that nf_ct_iterate_cleanup can run for a very long time
since it can be interrupted by softirq processing.
Moreover, atomic_notifier_call_chain runs with rcu readlock held.
So lets call cond_resched() in nf_ct_iterate_cleanup loop and defer
the call to a work queue for the atomic_notifier_call_chain case.
Reported-by: Ulrich Weber <uw@ocedo.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
Patch also applies to nf-next tree in case you think nf tree isn't appropriate.
net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_masquerade_ipv6.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 3 ++
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_masquerade_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_masquerade_ipv6.c
index 31ba7ca..a877dee 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_masquerade_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_nat_masquerade_ipv6.c
@@ -78,14 +78,54 @@ static struct notifier_block masq_dev_notifier = {
.notifier_call = masq_device_event,
};
+struct masq_dev_slow_work {
+ struct work_struct work;
+ struct net *net;
+ int ifindex;
+};
+
+static void iterate_cleanup_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct masq_dev_slow_work *w;
+ struct net *net;
+ int ifindex;
+
+ w = container_of(work, struct masq_dev_slow_work, work);
+
+ net = w->net;
+ ifindex = w->ifindex;
+ kfree(w);
+
+ nf_ct_iterate_cleanup(net, device_cmp, (void *)(long)ifindex, 0, 0);
+
+ put_net(net);
+ module_put(THIS_MODULE);
+}
+
static int masq_inet_event(struct notifier_block *this,
unsigned long event, void *ptr)
{
struct inet6_ifaddr *ifa = ptr;
- struct netdev_notifier_info info;
+ struct masq_dev_slow_work *w;
+
+ if (event != NETDEV_DOWN || !try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+ /* can't call nf_ct_iterate_cleanup in atomic context */
+ w = kmalloc(sizeof(*w), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (w) {
+ const struct net_device *dev = ifa->idev->dev;
- netdev_notifier_info_init(&info, ifa->idev->dev);
- return masq_device_event(this, event, &info);
+ INIT_WORK(&w->work, iterate_cleanup_work);
+
+ w->ifindex = dev->ifindex;
+ w->net = get_net(dev_net(dev));
+ schedule_work(&w->work);
+ } else {
+ module_put(THIS_MODULE);
+ }
+
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
}
static struct notifier_block masq_inet_notifier = {
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 3cb3cb8..cffeb68 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1422,6 +1422,8 @@ void nf_ct_iterate_cleanup(struct net *net,
struct nf_conn *ct;
unsigned int bucket = 0;
+ might_sleep();
+
while ((ct = get_next_corpse(net, iter, data, &bucket)) != NULL) {
/* Time to push up daises... */
if (del_timer(&ct->timeout))
@@ -1430,6 +1432,7 @@ void nf_ct_iterate_cleanup(struct net *net,
/* ... else the timer will get him soon. */
nf_ct_put(ct);
+ cond_resched();
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_iterate_cleanup);
--
2.4.10
next reply other threads:[~2015-12-09 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-09 17:30 Florian Westphal [this message]
2015-12-11 11:42 ` [PATCH nf] netfilter: conntrack: resched in nf_ct_iterate_cleanup Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-12-11 11:53 ` Florian Westphal
2015-12-11 14:43 ` Florian Westphal
2015-12-11 17:16 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-12-11 17:21 ` Florian Westphal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-01-20 10:16 Florian Westphal
2016-02-01 17:38 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1449682209-20330-1-git-send-email-fw@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).