From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kaber@trash.net, fw@strlen.de
Subject: [PATCH nft 04/11] evaluate: don't adjust offset from resolve_protocol_conflict()
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 22:24:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1454016300-29969-5-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454016300-29969-1-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org>
This is not itself a conflict, move this check out of this function.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
src/evaluate.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/evaluate.c b/src/evaluate.c
index a294070..5ef035b 100644
--- a/src/evaluate.c
+++ b/src/evaluate.c
@@ -395,11 +395,6 @@ static int resolve_protocol_conflict(struct eval_ctx *ctx,
struct stmt *nstmt = NULL;
int link, err;
- if (desc == payload->payload.desc) {
- payload->payload.offset += ctx->pctx.protocol[base].offset;
- return 0;
- }
-
err = supersede_dep(ctx, desc, payload);
if (err <= 0)
return err;
@@ -448,6 +443,14 @@ static int __expr_evaluate_payload(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct expr *expr)
return -1;
list_add_tail(&nstmt->list, &ctx->stmt->list);
} else {
+ /* No conflict: Same payload protocol as context, adjust offset
+ * if needed.
+ */
+ if (desc == payload->payload.desc) {
+ payload->payload.offset +=
+ ctx->pctx.protocol[base].offset;
+ return 0;
+ }
/* If we already have context and this payload is on the same
* base, try to resolve the protocol conflict.
*/
--
2.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-28 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-28 21:24 [PATCH nft 00/11] revisiting protocol conflict resolution Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-01-28 21:24 ` [PATCH nft 01/11] evaluate: resolve_protocol_conflict() should return int Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-01-28 21:24 ` [PATCH nft 02/11] evaluate: move inet/netdev protocol context supersede logic to supersede_dep() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-01-28 21:24 ` [PATCH nft 03/11] evaluate: check if we have to resolve a conflict in first place Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-01-28 21:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2016-01-28 21:24 ` [PATCH nft 05/11] evaluate: only try to replace dummy protocol from link-layer context Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-01-28 21:24 ` [PATCH nft 06/11] evaluate: assert on invalid base in resolve_protocol_conflict() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-01-28 21:24 ` [PATCH nft 07/11] evaluate: wrap protocol context debunk into function Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-01-28 21:24 ` [PATCH nft 08/11] evaluate: generate ether type payload after meta iiftype Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-01-28 21:24 ` [PATCH nft 09/11] proto: proto_dev_type() returns interface type for base protocols too Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-01-28 21:24 ` [PATCH nft 10/11] src: annotate follow up dependency just after killing another Pablo Neira Ayuso
2016-01-28 21:25 ` [PATCH nft 11/11] tests/py: test vlan on ingress Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1454016300-29969-5-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).