From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH nf 1/2] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: incorrect assumption on lower interval lookups
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 21:53:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1488401606-11151-1-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org> (raw)
In case of adjacent ranges, we may indeed see either the high part of
the range in first place or the low part of it. Remove this incorrect
assumption, let's make sure we annotate the low part of the interval in
case of we have adjacent interva intervals so we hit a matching in
lookups.
Reported-by: Simon Hanisch <hanisch@wh2.tu-dresden.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c b/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
index 71e8fb886a73..78dfbf9588b3 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
@@ -60,11 +60,10 @@ static bool nft_rbtree_lookup(const struct net *net, const struct nft_set *set,
d = memcmp(this, key, set->klen);
if (d < 0) {
parent = parent->rb_left;
- /* In case of adjacent ranges, we always see the high
- * part of the range in first place, before the low one.
- * So don't update interval if the keys are equal.
- */
- if (interval && nft_rbtree_equal(set, this, interval))
+ if (interval &&
+ nft_rbtree_equal(set, this, interval) &&
+ nft_rbtree_interval_end(this) &&
+ !nft_rbtree_interval_end(interval))
continue;
interval = rbe;
} else if (d > 0)
--
2.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-01 21:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-01 20:53 Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2017-03-01 20:53 ` [PATCH nf 2/2] netfilter: nf_tables: netlink listener hits ESRCH on socket overrun Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1488401606-11151-1-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).