From: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@163.com>
To: pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH nf V2] netfilter: invoke synchronize_rcu after set the _hook_ to NULL
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 08:53:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1490403192-15663-1-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com> (raw)
From: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
Otherwise, another CPU may access the invalid pointer. For example:
CPU0 CPU1
- rcu_read_lock();
- pfunc = _hook_;
_hook_ = NULL; -
mod unload -
- pfunc(); // invalid, panic
- rcu_read_unlock();
So we must call synchronize_rcu() to wait the rcu reader to finish.
Also note, in nf_nat_snmp_basic_fini, synchronize_rcu() will be invoked
by later nf_conntrack_helper_unregister, but I'm inclined to add a
explicit synchronize_rcu after set the nf_nat_snmp_hook to NULL. Depend
on such obscure assumptions is not a good idea.
Last, in nfnetlink_cttimeout, we use kfree_rcu to free the time object,
so in cttimeout_exit, invoking rcu_barrier() is not necessary at all,
remove it too.
Signed-off-by: Liping Zhang <zlpnobody@gmail.com>
---
V2: no need to call synchronize_rcu in nf_conntrack_unregister_notifier
and nf_ct_expect_unregister_notifier, per Pablo.
net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_snmp_basic.c | 1 +
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c | 2 ++
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 1 +
net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c | 2 ++
net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_snmp_basic.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_snmp_basic.c
index c9b52c3..5a8f7c3 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_snmp_basic.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_snmp_basic.c
@@ -1304,6 +1304,7 @@ static int __init nf_nat_snmp_basic_init(void)
static void __exit nf_nat_snmp_basic_fini(void)
{
RCU_INIT_POINTER(nf_nat_snmp_hook, NULL);
+ synchronize_rcu();
nf_conntrack_helper_unregister(&snmp_trap_helper);
}
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c
index da9df2d..22fc321 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.c
@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ void nf_conntrack_unregister_notifier(struct net *net,
BUG_ON(notify != new);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(net->ct.nf_conntrack_event_cb, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
+ /* synchronize_rcu() is called from ctnetlink_exit. */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_conntrack_unregister_notifier);
@@ -326,6 +327,7 @@ void nf_ct_expect_unregister_notifier(struct net *net,
BUG_ON(notify != new);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(net->ct.nf_expect_event_cb, NULL);
mutex_unlock(&nf_ct_ecache_mutex);
+ /* synchronize_rcu() is called from ctnetlink_exit. */
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_ct_expect_unregister_notifier);
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index 6806b5e..908d858 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -3442,6 +3442,7 @@ static void __exit ctnetlink_exit(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_NETLINK_GLUE_CT
RCU_INIT_POINTER(nfnl_ct_hook, NULL);
#endif
+ synchronize_rcu();
}
module_init(ctnetlink_init);
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
index 94b14c5..82802e4 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_nat_core.c
@@ -903,6 +903,8 @@ static void __exit nf_nat_cleanup(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
RCU_INIT_POINTER(nf_nat_decode_session_hook, NULL);
#endif
+ synchronize_rcu();
+
for (i = 0; i < NFPROTO_NUMPROTO; i++)
kfree(nf_nat_l4protos[i]);
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
index 139e086..47d6656 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink_cttimeout.c
@@ -646,8 +646,8 @@ static void __exit cttimeout_exit(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_TIMEOUT
RCU_INIT_POINTER(nf_ct_timeout_find_get_hook, NULL);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(nf_ct_timeout_put_hook, NULL);
+ synchronize_rcu();
#endif /* CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_TIMEOUT */
- rcu_barrier();
}
module_init(cttimeout_init);
--
2.5.5
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-25 0:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-25 0:53 Liping Zhang [this message]
2017-03-27 11:54 ` [PATCH nf V2] netfilter: invoke synchronize_rcu after set the _hook_ to NULL Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1490403192-15663-1-git-send-email-zlpnobody@163.com \
--to=zlpnobody@163.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=zlpnobody@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).