netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xt_CHECKSUM: avoid bad offload warnings on GSO packets
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 15:08:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1503580122.2958.37.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170824110742.qby3yoz3emf6pr5i@unicorn.suse.cz>

On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 13:07 +0200, Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:51:18PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz> wrote:
> > > When --checksum_fill action is applied to a GSO packet, checksum_tg() calls
> > > skb_checksum_help() which is only meant to be applied to non-GSO packets so
> > > that it issues a warning.
> > > 
> > > This can be easily triggered by using e.g.
> > > 
> > >   iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -j CHECKSUM --checksum-fill
> > > 
> > > and sending TCP stream via a device with GSO enabled.
> > > 
> > > While this can be considered a misconfiguration, I believe the bad offload
> > > warning is supposed to catch bugs in drivers and networking stack, not
> > > misconfigured firewalls. So let's ignore such packets and only issue a one
> > > time warning with pr_warn_once() rather than a WARN with stack trace and
> > > tainted kernel.
> > 
> > Why issue a warning at all?
> > What kind of action should be taken upon seeing such warning?
> 
> Check and fix the configuration. The reason why I left at least some
> kind of warning is that the module does something that is unexpected as
> the checksum is not calculated (this module is often used in
> virtualization environments where "hardware checksum offload" in fact
> means the checksum is not computed at all).
> 

hello Michal,

GSO should be capable of computing the checksum on individual segments
later, so I also think the warning can be removed.

Small nit: may I suggest you to call skb_csum_hwoffload_help() instead of
skb_checksum_help(), so that we avoid corrupting SCTP packets in case they
hit xt_CHECKSUM target?

thank you in advance,
regards
-- 
davide

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-24 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-24 10:48 [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: xt_CHECKSUM: avoid bad offload warnings on GSO packets Michal Kubecek
2017-08-24 10:51 ` Florian Westphal
2017-08-24 11:07   ` Michal Kubecek
2017-08-24 13:08     ` Davide Caratti [this message]
2017-08-24 13:17       ` Florian Westphal
2017-08-25  9:28         ` Michal Kubecek
2017-08-25  9:40           ` Florian Westphal
2017-08-25  9:43             ` Florian Westphal
2017-08-25  9:21       ` Michal Kubecek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1503580122.2958.37.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=dcaratti@redhat.com \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markos.chandras@suse.com \
    --cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).