From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Denys Fedoryshchenko Subject: Re: KASAN, xt_TCPMSS finally found nasty use-after-free bug? 4.10.8 Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 15:14:04 +0300 Message-ID: <194a53b80a3cd7fcc360ecf4e1dbf692@nuclearcat.com> References: <6c6e2f7505f969d8c2998efff24063ba@nuclearcat.com> <1491132259.10124.3.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <20170402114545.GA31804@breakpoint.cc> <1491134084.10124.6.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1491135593.10124.9.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <4442718191e17f0ff91bf1359da6d631@nuclearcat.com> <1491136344.10124.10.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1491153268.10124.12.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <1491153972.10124.14.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> <35bef48734458fd995d9d4080da5db22@nuclearcat.com> <1491221343.10124.16.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Florian Westphal , Linux Kernel Network Developers , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Patrick McHardy , Jozsef Kadlecsik , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1491221343.10124.16.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On 2017-04-03 15:09, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 11:10 +0300, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote: > >> I modified patch a little as: >> if (th->doff * 4 < sizeof(_tcph)) { >> par->hotdrop = true; >> WARN_ON_ONCE(!tcpinfo->option); >> return false; >> } >> >> And it did triggered WARN once at morning, and didn't hit KASAN. I >> will >> run for a while more, to see if it is ok, and then if stable, will try >> to enable SFQ again. > > Excellent news ! > We will post an official fix today, thanks a lot for this detective > work > Denys. I am not sure it is finally fixed, maybe we need test more? I'm doing extensive tests today with identical configuration (i had to run fifo, because customer cannot afford anymore outages). I've dded sfq now different way, and identical config i will run after 3 hours approx.