From: Ulrich Weber <uweber.linux@gmail.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] SIP conntrack handler and TCP fragmentation
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 10:52:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e3ffb89-2c24-526a-01aa-53794d554202@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161012075212.GA26177@breakpoint.cc>
Hi Florian,
On 12.10.2016 09:52, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Ulrich Weber <ulrich.weber@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I know the proper solution would be TCP defragmentation
>> in the nf_conntrack_sip kernel module. However I'm not
>> sure if this is worth the effort.
>
> I think an even better solution would be a SIP proxy that can
> inject expectations to keep datapath in kernel and only deals with
> the signalling traffic.
Yes your right, is there already one capable of doing this?
But then again, I dont want to put a proxy on an embedded box ;)
>
>> What about just accepting unparsable TCP SIP packets?
>
> I wonder why this patch did not fix your problem:
>
> 3a7b21eaf4fb3c971bdb47a98f570550ddfe4471
> Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> netfilter: nf_ct_sip: don't drop packets with offsets pointing outside the packet
>
> It specifically deals with this problem (l7 size larger than packet
> size).
>From reading the code this fixed the problem when Content-Length
points to one of the next TCP fragments.
In our case Content-Length is always 0 with a couple of SUBSCRIBE calls.
E.g. a TCP packet starting with this will break the SIP connection tracking:
INVITE,NOTIFY,OPTIONS,REFER,REGISTER,UPDATE,SUBSCRIBE
Content-Length: 0
The previous TCP packet was accepted by SIP connection tracking
because it had no Content-Length field.
Cheers
Ulrich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-12 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-12 7:38 [RFC] SIP conntrack handler and TCP fragmentation Ulrich Weber
2016-10-12 7:52 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-12 8:52 ` Ulrich Weber [this message]
2016-10-12 11:41 ` Florian Westphal
2016-10-12 12:27 ` Ulrich Weber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e3ffb89-2c24-526a-01aa-53794d554202@gmail.com \
--to=uweber.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).