From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?R=E9mi_Denis-Courmont?= Subject: Re: [patch] netfilter: implement TCPMSS target for IPv6 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:08:01 +0200 Message-ID: <200702121808.04643@auguste.remlab.net> References: <20070114192011.GA6270@clipper.ens.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1351427.FdJYKqlN8S"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Madore To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070114192011.GA6270@clipper.ens.fr> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org --nextPart1351427.FdJYKqlN8S Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Le dimanche 14 janvier 2007 21:20, David Madore a =E9crit : > Implement TCPMSS target for IPv6 by shamelessly copying from > Marc Boucher's IPv4 implementation. Most of the code seems to be TCP- rather IPvXY- specific. Would it not=20 make more sense to just write a xt_TCPMSS implementation to rule them=20 all? =2D-=20 R=E9mi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ --nextPart1351427.FdJYKqlN8S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkXQkOQACgkQw+xtvt1tEr0ujQCg+FGknjWn90221/FXKfV1qZQT piMAoNVHCJ/jZMgo3Ohl+8XPBPhb5IlW =avpw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1351427.FdJYKqlN8S--