From: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
To: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-net@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 06:40:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710200640.02012.a1426z@gawab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <471699A0.3060303@tmr.com>
Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Bill Davidsen wrote:
> >>>> If not, then shouldn't the filter table be obsoleted to avoid
> >>>> confusion?
> >>>
> >>> That would probably confuse people. Just don't use it if you don't
> >>> need to.
> >
> > That is a most practical suggestion.
> >
> >> The problem is that people think they are safe with the filter table,
> >> when in fact they need the prerouting chain to seal things. Right now
> >> this is only possible in the mangle table.
> >
> > I'm not sure what you think is unsafe about using the filter table, and
> > the order of evaluation issues certainly seem to suggest that some
> > actions would take a major rethink at least. Perhaps you could avoid
> > breaking all of the setups which currently work, rather than force
> > everyone to do things differently because you feel that your way is
> > better.
>
> It was my intention to suggest that unintentional breakage of existing
> setups should be avoided, not that removing the filter table was some
> evil plot. ;-)
> On rereading my original post I failed to make that clear, please take
> it as intended.
Sure, the idea was to mark the filter table obsolete as to make people start
using the mangle table to do their filtering for new setups. The filter
table would then still be available for legacy/special setups. But this
would only be possible if we at least ported the REJECT target to mangle.
Thanks!
--
Al
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-20 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200710120031.42805.a1426z@gawab.com>
[not found] ` <470EF994.4080403@trash.net>
2007-10-12 4:39 ` [RFD] iptables: mangle table obsoletes filter table Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 5:37 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 11:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 12:25 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 12:31 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 13:18 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 13:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 22:56 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-17 22:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-17 23:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-20 3:40 ` Al Boldi [this message]
2007-10-20 4:47 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-20 11:10 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-21 4:31 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-21 4:53 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-23 22:27 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-10-12 13:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-12 13:30 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 13:39 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-12 13:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 14:02 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-10-12 14:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 22:56 ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12 23:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-10-12 5:14 Al Boldi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200710200640.02012.a1426z@gawab.com \
--to=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).