From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: netfilter 02/03: ipt_recent: fix race between recent_mt_destroy and proc manipulations
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 08:33:15 +0200 (MEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080731063314.18150.31778.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080731063312.18150.49494.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain>
netfilter: ipt_recent: fix race between recent_mt_destroy and proc manipulations
The thing is that recent_mt_destroy first flushes the entries
from table with the recent_table_flush and only *after* this
removes the proc file, corresponding to that table.
Thus, if we manage to write to this file the '+XXX' command we
will leak some entries. If we manage to write there a 'clean'
command we'll race in two recent_table_flush flows, since the
recent_mt_destroy calls this outside the recent_lock.
The proper solution as I see it is to remove the proc file first
and then go on with flushing the table. This flushing becomes
safe w/o the lock, since the table is already inaccessible from
the outside.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
---
commit 728845f8c11ec11be4a3725a70389a3013cd4e48
tree c6dfca9346769ab48550ba27c28a3ba2af94e30b
parent 827768d3835412f6ba386c9fc2d6fdbde0c2c0ee
author Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:52:38 +0200
committer Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Wed, 30 Jul 2008 12:52:38 +0200
net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c
index 21cb053..3974d7c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_recent.c
@@ -305,10 +305,10 @@ static void recent_mt_destroy(const struct xt_match *match, void *matchinfo)
spin_lock_bh(&recent_lock);
list_del(&t->list);
spin_unlock_bh(&recent_lock);
- recent_table_flush(t);
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
remove_proc_entry(t->name, proc_dir);
#endif
+ recent_table_flush(t);
kfree(t);
}
mutex_unlock(&recent_mutex);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-31 6:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-31 6:33 netfilter 00/03: netfilter update/fixes Patrick McHardy
2008-07-31 6:33 ` netfilter 01/03: nf_conntrack_tcp: decrease timeouts while data in unacknowledged Patrick McHardy
2008-07-31 7:38 ` David Miller
2009-06-26 14:39 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-06-26 15:14 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-26 16:31 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-06-26 17:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-26 17:31 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2009-06-29 12:20 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-07-31 6:33 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-07-31 6:33 ` netfilter 03/03: xt_hashlimit: fix race between htable_destroy and htable_gc Patrick McHardy
2008-07-31 7:39 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080731063314.18150.31778.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).