Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Pkttype match mismatches in OUTPUT chain
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:06:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080903160608.GB8460@linuxace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080814120240.GA30222@linuxace.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 771 bytes --]

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 05:02:40AM -0700, Phil Oester wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 03:32:24PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > This is getting more and more kludgy, wouldn't it make more sense
> > to move the pkt_type initialisation from the device layer to the
> > protocol layer?
> 
> It would, but that's a large-ish change, and unknown if DaveM would
> support it just to make an iptables match less kludgy.  
> 
> Unfortunately, it doesn't appear this match was tested very thoroughly
> prior to being added to the tree...
> 
> Phil

Any further thoughts on this Patrick?  Longer-term, your plan would help,
but perhaps in the interim we should get this queued up for 2.6.27 so
we have a working match for OUTPUT packets?

Original patch included below.

Phil


[-- Attachment #2: patch-pkttype-output --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1115 bytes --]

diff --git a/net/netfilter/xt_pkttype.c b/net/netfilter/xt_pkttype.c
index 7936f7e..7036d43 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/xt_pkttype.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/xt_pkttype.c
@@ -29,18 +29,21 @@ pkttype_mt(const struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_device *in,
            bool *hotdrop)
 {
 	const struct xt_pkttype_info *info = matchinfo;
-	u_int8_t type;
+	u_int8_t type = 0; 
 
-	if (skb->pkt_type != PACKET_LOOPBACK)
-		type = skb->pkt_type;
-	else if (match->family == AF_INET &&
-	    ipv4_is_multicast(ip_hdr(skb)->daddr))
-		type = PACKET_MULTICAST;
-	else if (match->family == AF_INET6 &&
+	if (match->family == AF_INET) {
+		struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dst->dev);
+		const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
+		if (ipv4_is_multicast(iph->daddr))
+			type = PACKET_MULTICAST;
+		else if (inet_addr_type(net, iph->daddr) == RTN_BROADCAST)
+			type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
+	} else if (match->family == AF_INET6 &&
 	    ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr.s6_addr[0] == 0xFF)
 		type = PACKET_MULTICAST;
-	else
-		type = PACKET_BROADCAST;
+
+	if (!type)
+		type = skb->pkt_type;
 
 	return (type == info->pkttype) ^ info->invert;
 }

      reply	other threads:[~2008-09-03 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-10 22:18 [PATCH] Pkttype match mismatches in OUTPUT chain Phil Oester
2008-08-10 22:53 ` Phil Oester
2008-08-13 13:32   ` Patrick McHardy
2008-08-14 12:02     ` Phil Oester
2008-09-03 16:06       ` Phil Oester [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080903160608.GB8460@linuxace.com \
    --to=kernel@linuxace.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox