From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: netfilter 00/03: netfilter -stable fixes Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 19:45:29 -0700 Message-ID: <20081028024529.GA17128@suse.de> References: <20081022174126.21341.38231.sendpatchset@x2.localnet> <49014390.7080909@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: stable@kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Patrick McHardy To: Krzysztof Oledzki Return-path: Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:37979 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751918AbYJ1DV4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:21:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 03:13:32AM +0100, Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: > > > On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >> Krzysztof Oledzki wrote: >>> On Wed, 22 Oct 2008, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>>> The following three patches for -stable fix some netfilter issues: >>>> - a regression in the iprange match, causing mismatches with inversion >>>> - a memory leak in the SNMP NAT helper >>>> - a lost #ifdef, allowing user-triggerable WARN_ONs with NETFILTER_DEBUG >>>> (and some minor runtime misbehaviour) >>> Which kernels need above patches? Only 2.6.27 or also 2.6.25/2.6.26? >> >> I think all three patches are also needed for 2.6.25 and 2.6.26. > > Thank you for the confirmation. > > Greg, could you please put above patches info queue-2.6.25/queue-2.6.26? Will do, thanks. greg k-h