* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sctp: fix build warning
[not found] ` <20081124011727.GA6462@localhost>
@ 2008-11-24 12:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-11-24 12:35 ` Wu Fengguang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2008-11-24 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu Fengguang
Cc: Wang Chen, David Miller, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 527 bytes --]
Wu Fengguang wrote:
>> print some debug info would be better?
>
> Like this one?
> + pr_debug("Empty sctp packet\n");
>
> Fengguang
> ---
> netfilter: nf_conntrack_sctp: fix build warning
>
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c: In function ‘sctp_packet’:
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c:376: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
The warning is bogus, so we don't need a pr_debug() there.
I've applied your first patch with an unlikely() added and
a comment stating that the warning is bogus.
[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1173 bytes --]
commit a3e2913ffd3dec7f6975f680035670261ad5f56e
Author: Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon Nov 24 13:18:00 2008 +0100
netfilter: nf_conntrack_sctp: fix build warning
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c: In function 'sctp_packet':
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c:376: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
[Patrick; add unlikely and comment stating that the warning is bogus]
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
index c2bd457..1259ec6 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
@@ -373,6 +373,12 @@ static int sctp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
}
write_unlock_bh(&sctp_lock);
+ /* Avoid bogus warning, gcc doesn't realize do_basic_checks()
+ * guarantees that there is at least one SCTP chunk.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(new_state == SCTP_CONNTRACK_MAX))
+ goto out;
+
nf_ct_refresh_acct(ct, ctinfo, skb, sctp_timeouts[new_state]);
if (old_state == SCTP_CONNTRACK_COOKIE_ECHOED &&
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sctp: fix build warning
2008-11-24 12:23 ` [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sctp: fix build warning Patrick McHardy
@ 2008-11-24 12:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2008-11-24 12:48 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wu Fengguang @ 2008-11-24 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick McHardy
Cc: Wang Chen, David Miller, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:23:16PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Wu Fengguang wrote:
> >> print some debug info would be better?
> >
> > Like this one?
> > + pr_debug("Empty sctp packet\n");
> >
> > Fengguang
> > ---
> > netfilter: nf_conntrack_sctp: fix build warning
> >
> > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c: In function ‘sctp_packet’:
> > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c:376: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
>
> The warning is bogus, so we don't need a pr_debug() there.
> I've applied your first patch with an unlikely() added and
> a comment stating that the warning is bogus.
Thank you! I was expecting some better solution (and learn a bit) ;-)
> commit a3e2913ffd3dec7f6975f680035670261ad5f56e
> Author: Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Mon Nov 24 13:18:00 2008 +0100
>
> netfilter: nf_conntrack_sctp: fix build warning
>
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c: In function 'sctp_packet':
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c:376: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
>
> [Patrick; add unlikely and comment stating that the warning is bogus]
>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
> index c2bd457..1259ec6 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -373,6 +373,12 @@ static int sctp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
> }
> write_unlock_bh(&sctp_lock);
>
> + /* Avoid bogus warning, gcc doesn't realize do_basic_checks()
> + * guarantees that there is at least one SCTP chunk.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(new_state == SCTP_CONNTRACK_MAX))
> + goto out;
> +
If do_basic_checks() guarantees that, why not Initialize new_state to 0?
---
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
index ae8c260..218137d 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
@@ -317,7 +317,11 @@ static int sctp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
goto out;
}
- old_state = new_state = SCTP_CONNTRACK_MAX;
+ /* Avoid bogus warning, gcc doesn't realize do_basic_checks()
+ * guarantees that there is at least one SCTP chunk.
+ */
+ old_state = new_state = 0;
+
write_lock_bh(&sctp_lock);
for_each_sctp_chunk (skb, sch, _sch, offset, dataoff, count) {
/* Special cases of Verification tag check (Sec 8.5.1) */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netfilter-devel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sctp: fix build warning
2008-11-24 12:35 ` Wu Fengguang
@ 2008-11-24 12:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-11-24 12:50 ` Wu Fengguang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2008-11-24 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu Fengguang
Cc: Wang Chen, David Miller, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 423 bytes --]
Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:23:16PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> + /* Avoid bogus warning, gcc doesn't realize do_basic_checks()
>> + * guarantees that there is at least one SCTP chunk.
>> + */
>> + if (unlikely(new_state == SCTP_CONNTRACK_MAX))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>
> If do_basic_checks() guarantees that, why not Initialize new_state to 0?
Good point. I've replaced the patch by this one:
[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1260 bytes --]
commit 328bd8997dbb7184d5389e45c642af44ae6e9043
Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Date: Mon Nov 24 13:44:55 2008 +0100
netfilter: nf_conntrack_proto_sctp: avoid bogus warning
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c: In function 'sctp_packet':
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c:376: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
gcc doesn't realize that do_basic_checks() guarantees that there is
at least one valid chunk and thus new_state is never SCTP_CONNTRACK_MAX
after the loop. Initialize to SCTP_CONNTRACK_NONE to avoid the warning.
Based on patch by Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
index c2bd457..74e0379 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static int sctp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
goto out;
}
- old_state = new_state = SCTP_CONNTRACK_MAX;
+ old_state = new_state = SCTP_CONNTRACK_NONE;
write_lock_bh(&sctp_lock);
for_each_sctp_chunk (skb, sch, _sch, offset, dataoff, count) {
/* Special cases of Verification tag check (Sec 8.5.1) */
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sctp: fix build warning
2008-11-24 12:48 ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2008-11-24 12:50 ` Wu Fengguang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wu Fengguang @ 2008-11-24 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick McHardy
Cc: Wang Chen, David Miller, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:48:07PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:23:16PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> >> + /* Avoid bogus warning, gcc doesn't realize do_basic_checks()
> >> + * guarantees that there is at least one SCTP chunk.
> >> + */
> >> + if (unlikely(new_state == SCTP_CONNTRACK_MAX))
> >> + goto out;
> >> +
> >
> > If do_basic_checks() guarantees that, why not Initialize new_state to 0?
>
> Good point. I've replaced the patch by this one:
Thanks!
Fengguang
Content-Description: x
> commit 328bd8997dbb7184d5389e45c642af44ae6e9043
> Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
> Date: Mon Nov 24 13:44:55 2008 +0100
>
> netfilter: nf_conntrack_proto_sctp: avoid bogus warning
>
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c: In function 'sctp_packet':
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c:376: warning: array subscript is above array bounds
>
> gcc doesn't realize that do_basic_checks() guarantees that there is
> at least one valid chunk and thus new_state is never SCTP_CONNTRACK_MAX
> after the loop. Initialize to SCTP_CONNTRACK_NONE to avoid the warning.
>
> Based on patch by Wu Fengguang <wfg@linux.intel.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
> index c2bd457..74e0379 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_sctp.c
> @@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ static int sctp_packet(struct nf_conn *ct,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - old_state = new_state = SCTP_CONNTRACK_MAX;
> + old_state = new_state = SCTP_CONNTRACK_NONE;
> write_lock_bh(&sctp_lock);
> for_each_sctp_chunk (skb, sch, _sch, offset, dataoff, count) {
> /* Special cases of Verification tag check (Sec 8.5.1) */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-24 12:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20081123113315.GA16697@localhost>
[not found] ` <20081123.135955.202482968.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <20081124000652.GA5424@localhost>
[not found] ` <4929FEA9.9090801@cn.fujitsu.com>
[not found] ` <20081124011727.GA6462@localhost>
2008-11-24 12:23 ` [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack_sctp: fix build warning Patrick McHardy
2008-11-24 12:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2008-11-24 12:48 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-11-24 12:50 ` Wu Fengguang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).