* destination NAT suggestion
@ 2009-01-07 22:20 Derek Ng
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Derek Ng @ 2009-01-07 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
Hello,
Currently, iptables has the following behavior:
1) Packet enters to the incoming interface
2) Check the INPUT rules
3) Prerouting NAT check and perform source NAT
4) Check the FORWARD rules
5) Postrouting NAT check and perform destination NAT
6) Check the OUTPUT rules
The above flow has a limitation when performing the NAT. SNAT can only be
performed under PREROUTING chain and DNAT can only be done on POSTROUTING
NAT. It would be great if this limitation is removed.
Reasons:
1) Gain more control on routing table
a) The host's routing table would be cleaner, no matter what the destination
networks are.
2) More flexible and more competitive
a) Engineer can design a cleaner and securer Linux firewalls and be creative
b) Easier for troubleshooting when the routing table is clean
c) More competitive to Cisco IOS NAT features (Inside Global, Inside Local,
Outside Local, Outside Global)
Senario Example:
1) Assume the web servers IP addresses for yahoo and google as the following
a) Yahoo: 10.10.10.1
b) Google: 10.10.10.1
2) The firewall has three interfaces
a) Inside LAN (172.16.0.0/24 network)
b) Yahoo direct line (next hop IP is 192.168.1.1)
c) Google direct line (next hop IP is 192.168.1.2)
3) iptables DNAT
a) 172.16.1.1 > 10.10.10.1
b) 172.16.1.2 > 10.10.10.1
3) Current Limitation
a) Inside host tries to connect to Yahoo web server, 172.16.1.1.
b) iptables receives the packet and performs the prerouting DNAT 172.16.1.1 >
10.10.10.1
c) Based on the 10.10.10.1 destination, the host will try to forward the
packet based on the routing table, which can only point to 192.168.1.1 or
192.168.1.2.
d) Routing table.
Either 1) 10.10.10.1 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 eth1
or 2) 10.10.10.1 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.255 eth2
4) Without the current limitation
a) Inside host tries to connect to Yahoo web server, 172.16.1.1
b) Host receives the packet and forward it to the outside interface based on
the routing table.
c) iptables performs the postrouting DNAT before sending it out to the next
hop 192.168.1.1, 172.16.1.1 > 10.10.10.1
d) Routing table.
172.16.1.1 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.255 eth1
172.16.1.2 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.255 eth2
If you need further information, please feel free to contact me at
631-246-7626 or email me at derek@rentec.com
Thank you very much!
Sincerely,
Derek Ng
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-01-07 22:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-07 22:20 destination NAT suggestion Derek Ng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).