netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] netfilter: convert x_tables to use RCU
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:12:45 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090129191520.647342549@vyatta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20090129191239.483204605@vyatta.com

[-- Attachment #1: iptables-rcu.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 8125 bytes --]

Replace existing reader/writer lock with Read-Copy-Update to
elminate the overhead of a read lock on each incoming packet.
This should reduce the overhead of iptables especially on SMP
systems.

The previous code used a reader-writer lock for two purposes.
The first was to ensure that the xt_table_info reference was not in
process of being changed. Since xt_table_info is only freed via one
routine, it was a direct conversion to RCU.

The other use of the reader-writer lock was to to block changes
to counters while they were being read. This synchronization was
fixed by the previous patch.  But still need to make sure table info
isn't going away.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>


---
 include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h |   10 ++++++--
 net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c    |   12 ++++-----
 net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c     |   12 ++++-----
 net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c    |   12 ++++-----
 net/netfilter/x_tables.c           |   45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 5 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h	2009-01-29 11:09:20.724069866 -0800
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h	2009-01-29 11:10:49.823071289 -0800
@@ -357,8 +357,8 @@ struct xt_table
 	/* What hooks you will enter on */
 	unsigned int valid_hooks;
 
-	/* Lock for the curtain */
-	rwlock_t lock;
+	/* Lock for curtain */
+	spinlock_t lock;
 
 	/* Man behind the curtain... */
 	struct xt_table_info *private;
@@ -388,6 +388,12 @@ struct xt_table_info
 	unsigned int hook_entry[NF_INET_NUMHOOKS];
 	unsigned int underflow[NF_INET_NUMHOOKS];
 
+	/* For the dustman... */
+	union {
+		struct rcu_head rcu;
+		struct work_struct work;
+	};
+
 	/* ipt_entry tables: one per CPU */
 	/* Note : this field MUST be the last one, see XT_TABLE_INFO_SZ */
 	char *entries[1];
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c	2009-01-29 11:09:20.720069979 -0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c	2009-01-29 11:10:49.823071289 -0800
@@ -237,8 +237,8 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buf
 	indev = in ? in->name : nulldevname;
 	outdev = out ? out->name : nulldevname;
 
-	read_lock_bh(&table->lock);
-	private = table->private;
+	rcu_read_lock_bh();
+	private = rcu_dereference(table->private);
 	table_base = (void *)private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
 	e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
 	back = get_entry(table_base, private->underflow[hook]);
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ unsigned int arpt_do_table(struct sk_buf
 			e = (void *)e + e->next_offset;
 		}
 	} while (!hotdrop);
-	read_unlock_bh(&table->lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock_bh();
 
 	if (hotdrop)
 		return NF_DROP;
@@ -1152,8 +1152,8 @@ static int do_add_counters(struct net *n
 		goto free;
 	}
 
-	write_lock_bh(&t->lock);
-	private = t->private;
+	rcu_read_lock_bh();
+	private = rcu_dereference(t->private);
 	if (private->number != num_counters) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto unlock_up_free;
@@ -1168,7 +1168,7 @@ static int do_add_counters(struct net *n
 			   paddc,
 			   &i);
  unlock_up_free:
-	write_unlock_bh(&t->lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock_bh();
 	xt_table_unlock(t);
 	module_put(t->me);
  free:
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c	2009-01-29 11:09:20.720069979 -0800
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c	2009-01-29 11:10:49.827070289 -0800
@@ -347,9 +347,9 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	mtpar.family  = tgpar.family = NFPROTO_IPV4;
 	tgpar.hooknum = hook;
 
-	read_lock_bh(&table->lock);
+	rcu_read_lock_bh();
 	IP_NF_ASSERT(table->valid_hooks & (1 << hook));
-	private = table->private;
+	private = rcu_dereference(table->private);
 	table_base = (void *)private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
 	e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
 
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ ipt_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 		}
 	} while (!hotdrop);
 
-	read_unlock_bh(&table->lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock_bh();
 
 #ifdef DEBUG_ALLOW_ALL
 	return NF_ACCEPT;
@@ -1397,8 +1397,8 @@ do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __
 		goto free;
 	}
 
-	write_lock_bh(&t->lock);
-	private = t->private;
+	rcu_read_lock_bh();
+	private = rcu_dereference(t->private);
 	if (private->number != num_counters) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto unlock_up_free;
@@ -1413,7 +1413,7 @@ do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __
 			  paddc,
 			  &i);
  unlock_up_free:
-	write_unlock_bh(&t->lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock_bh();
 	xt_table_unlock(t);
 	module_put(t->me);
  free:
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c	2009-01-29 11:09:20.724069866 -0800
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c	2009-01-29 11:10:49.827070289 -0800
@@ -373,9 +373,9 @@ ip6t_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 	mtpar.family  = tgpar.family = NFPROTO_IPV6;
 	tgpar.hooknum = hook;
 
-	read_lock_bh(&table->lock);
+	rcu_read_lock_bh();
 	IP_NF_ASSERT(table->valid_hooks & (1 << hook));
-	private = table->private;
+	private = rcu_dereference(table->private);
 	table_base = (void *)private->entries[smp_processor_id()];
 	e = get_entry(table_base, private->hook_entry[hook]);
 
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ ip6t_do_table(struct sk_buff *skb,
 #ifdef CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG
 	((struct ip6t_entry *)table_base)->comefrom = NETFILTER_LINK_POISON;
 #endif
-	read_unlock_bh(&table->lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock_bh();
 
 #ifdef DEBUG_ALLOW_ALL
 	return NF_ACCEPT;
@@ -1428,8 +1428,8 @@ do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __
 		goto free;
 	}
 
-	write_lock_bh(&t->lock);
-	private = t->private;
+	rcu_read_lock_bh();
+	private = rcu_dereference(t->private);
 	if (private->number != num_counters) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto unlock_up_free;
@@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ do_add_counters(struct net *net, void __
 			  paddc,
 			  &i);
  unlock_up_free:
-	write_unlock_bh(&t->lock);
+	rcu_read_unlock_bh();
 	xt_table_unlock(t);
 	module_put(t->me);
  free:
--- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c	2009-01-29 11:10:03.595571234 -0800
+++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c	2009-01-29 11:11:43.496192079 -0800
@@ -639,18 +639,37 @@ struct xt_table_info *xt_alloc_table_inf
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xt_alloc_table_info);
 
-void xt_free_table_info(struct xt_table_info *info)
+/* callback to do free for vmalloc'd case */
+static void xt_free_table_info_work(struct work_struct *arg)
 {
-	int cpu;
+	struct xt_table_info *info = container_of(arg, struct xt_table_info, work);
+	unsigned int cpu;
 
-	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
-		if (info->size <= PAGE_SIZE)
-			kfree(info->entries[cpu]);
-		else
-			vfree(info->entries[cpu]);
-	}
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+		vfree(info->entries[cpu]);
 	kfree(info);
 }
+
+static void xt_free_table_info_rcu(struct rcu_head *arg)
+{
+ 	struct xt_table_info *info = container_of(arg, struct xt_table_info, rcu);
+
+ 	if (info->size <= PAGE_SIZE) {
+		unsigned int cpu;
+ 		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
+ 			kfree(info->entries[cpu]);
+ 		kfree(info);
+ 	} else {
+ 		/* can't safely call vfree in current context */
+ 		INIT_WORK(&info->work, xt_free_table_info_work);
+ 		schedule_work(&info->work);
+  	}
+}
+
+void xt_free_table_info(struct xt_table_info *info)
+{
+ 	call_rcu(&info->rcu, xt_free_table_info_rcu);
+}
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xt_free_table_info);
 
 /* Find table by name, grabs mutex & ref.  Returns ERR_PTR() on error. */
@@ -699,20 +718,20 @@ xt_replace_table(struct xt_table *table,
 	struct xt_table_info *oldinfo, *private;
 
 	/* Do the substitution. */
-	write_lock_bh(&table->lock);
+	spin_lock_bh(&table->lock);
 	private = table->private;
 	/* Check inside lock: is the old number correct? */
 	if (num_counters != private->number) {
 		duprintf("num_counters != table->private->number (%u/%u)\n",
 			 num_counters, private->number);
-		write_unlock_bh(&table->lock);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&table->lock);
 		*error = -EAGAIN;
 		return NULL;
 	}
 	oldinfo = private;
-	table->private = newinfo;
+	rcu_assign_pointer(table->private, newinfo);
 	newinfo->initial_entries = oldinfo->initial_entries;
-	write_unlock_bh(&table->lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&table->lock);
 
 	return oldinfo;
 }
@@ -747,7 +766,7 @@ struct xt_table *xt_register_table(struc
 
 	/* Simplifies replace_table code. */
 	table->private = bootstrap;
-	rwlock_init(&table->lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&table->lock);
 	if (!xt_replace_table(table, 0, newinfo, &ret))
 		goto unlock;
 

-- 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-01-29 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-29 19:12 [PATCH 0/6] iptables: read/write lock elimination (v0.4) Stephen Hemminger
2009-01-29 19:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] netfilter: change elements in x_tables Stephen Hemminger
2009-01-29 19:12 ` [PATCH 2/6] netfilter: remove unneeded initializations Stephen Hemminger
2009-01-29 19:12 ` [PATCH 3/6] ebtables: " Stephen Hemminger
2009-01-29 19:12 ` [PATCH 4/6] netfilter: abstract xt_counters Stephen Hemminger
2009-01-29 19:12 ` [PATCH 5/6] netfilter: use sequence number synchronization for counters Stephen Hemminger
2009-01-30  8:03   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-01-29 19:12 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2009-01-29 23:39 ` [PATCH 0/6] iptables: read/write lock elimination (v0.4) Rick Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090129191520.647342549@vyatta.com \
    --to=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).