From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anton Subject: Re: (nfnl_talk: recvmsg over-run) and (nf_queue: full at 1024 entries, dropping packets(s). Dropped: 582) - bug or just some defaults increase required? Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:48:42 +0500 Message-ID: <200902111348.43413.anton.vazir@gmail.com> References: <200902091556.25407.anton.vazir@gmail.com> <49901176.6020502@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Pablo Neira Ayuso Return-path: Received: from mail.eastera.tj ([82.198.21.18]:57616 "EHLO mail.eastera.tj" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750958AbZBKIsy (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:48:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <49901176.6020502@netfilter.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I'll try to create a test environment for this, since it happened in the production PC, so it hard to just try the patch on production :) On Monday 09 February 2009 16:20, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Anton wrote: > > Pablo, > > > > Just a little more thought, this happened when my > > application attempted to create a NEW queue, while in > > kernel packet queue overrun situation. And after > > calling the nfq_create_queue there was no return from > > it, and only error message generation in the loop > > inside the libnetfilter_queue library. Looks like not a > > very proper behaviour. Am I missing something? > > Oh I see, I did not get the point initially. Does this > patch fix the problem?