netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, kaber@trash.net, rick.jones2@hp.com,
	dada1@cosmosbay.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	gandalf@wlug.westbo.se, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFT 2/4] Add mod_timer_noact
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:04:55 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090218.140455.142445208.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090218215140.GA3505@elte.hu>

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:51:40 +0100

> Anyway, it's all handled, you just need to read the rest of the 
> thread.

I did read the entire thread before replying, my objection
to your original posting still standed.

And as others have pointed out you also failed to recognize
the context of the patch posting.  It was part of a sequence
of patches for people to test some experimental netfilter
performance optimizations.  "RFT" was prefixed to every patch
subject line, if any more indication was necessary.

Yet you object that the patches are against the networking
and netfilter trees.

Again, your reactions were knee-jerk, by every definition of the
term.

I know how you work Ingo, you want to be fast and efficient.
But often, your "fast and efficient" is "careless", and this
wastes everyone elses time and in the final analysis makes
you "slow".

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-18 22:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-18  5:19 [RFT 0/4] Netfilter/iptables performance improvements Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-18  5:19 ` [RFT 1/4] iptables: lock free counters Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-18 10:02   ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-19 19:47   ` [PATCH] " Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-19 23:46     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-19 23:56       ` Rick Jones
2009-02-20  1:03         ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-20  1:18           ` Rick Jones
2009-02-20  9:42             ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-20 22:57               ` Rick Jones
2009-02-21  0:35                 ` Rick Jones
2009-02-20  9:37       ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-20 18:10       ` [PATCH] iptables: xt_hashlimit fix Eric Dumazet
2009-02-20 18:33         ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-02-28  1:54           ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-02-28  6:56             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-28  8:22               ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-02-24 14:31         ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-27 14:02       ` [PATCH] iptables: lock free counters Eric Dumazet
2009-02-27 16:08         ` [PATCH] rcu: increment quiescent state counter in ksoftirqd() Eric Dumazet
2009-02-27 16:34           ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-02 10:55         ` [PATCH] iptables: lock free counters Patrick McHardy
2009-03-02 17:47           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-02 21:56             ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-02 22:02               ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-03-02 22:07                 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-02 22:17                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-02 22:27                 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18  5:19 ` [RFT 2/4] Add mod_timer_noact Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-18  9:20   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18  9:30     ` David Miller
2009-02-18 11:01       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 11:39         ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-02-18 12:37           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 12:33         ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 21:39         ` David Miller
2009-02-18 21:51           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 22:04             ` David Miller [this message]
2009-02-18 22:42               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-02-18 22:47                 ` David Miller
2009-02-18 22:56                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-18 10:07     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 12:05       ` [patch] timers: add mod_timer_pending() Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 12:33         ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 12:50           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 12:54             ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 13:47               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 17:00         ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-18 18:23           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 18:58             ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-02-18 19:24               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-18 10:29   ` [RFT 2/4] Add mod_timer_noact Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18  5:19 ` [RFT 3/4] Use mod_timer_noact to remove nf_conntrack_lock Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-18  9:54   ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 11:05   ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-02-18 11:08     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 14:01   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18 14:04     ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 14:22       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-18 14:27         ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18  5:19 ` [RFT 4/4] netfilter: Get rid of central rwlock in tcp conntracking Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-18  9:56   ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 14:17     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-02-19 22:03       ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-03-28 16:55       ` [PATCH] netfilter: finer grained nf_conn locking Eric Dumazet
2009-03-29  0:48         ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-03-30 19:57           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-30 20:05             ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-04-06 12:07               ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-06 12:32                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2009-04-06 17:25                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-03-30 18:57         ` Rick Jones
2009-03-30 19:20           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-30 19:38           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-30 19:54             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-30 20:34               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-30 20:41                 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-03-30 21:25                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-30 22:44                   ` Rick Jones
2009-02-18 21:55     ` [RFT 4/4] netfilter: Get rid of central rwlock in tcp conntracking David Miller
2009-02-18 23:23       ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-18 23:35         ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-18  8:30 ` [RFT 0/4] Netfilter/iptables performance improvements Eric Dumazet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090218.140455.142445208.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=gandalf@wlug.westbo.se \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).