From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update jhash.h with the new version of Jenkins' hash
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:41:44 +1030
Message-ID: <200902181541.45159.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0902111107480.15665@blackhole.kfki.hu> <f73f7ab80902120546w2ac30501v10fc55b9c8270be9@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.0902171723330.27283@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Kyle Moffett <kyle@moffetthome.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
To: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0902171723330.27283@blackhole.kfki.hu>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday 18 February 2009 03:43:04 Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2009, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Any stats on code size changes?
> compiled with -Os, then stripped, give:
> 
> -rw-r--r-- 1 kadlec kadlec 1080 2009-02-17 14:10 lookup2.o
> -rw-r--r-- 1 kadlec kadlec 1024 2009-02-17 14:10 lookup3.o

The "size" command is more usual.  This looks like a total win to me.

Thanks for being so thorough!
Rusty.