From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 27 (netfilter build error) Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:46:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090329.134614.198823811.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20090329064704.GA7255@localhost> <20090328.234739.26481917.davem@davemloft.net> <49CF62A2.6050803@netfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gorcunov@gmail.com, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kaber@trash.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: pablo@netfilter.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49CF62A2.6050803@netfilter.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org From: Pablo Neira Ayuso Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:59:30 +0200 > David Miller wrote: > > From: Cyrill Gorcunov > > Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:47:04 +0400 > > > >> [Randy Dunlap - Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:26:42PM -0700] > >> ... > >> | works_for_me. Thanks. > >> | but missing S-O-B. > >> | > >> | Acked-by: Randy Dunlap > >> ... > >> > >> Thanks for testing Randy. So if nobody will complain > >> here is a solid version of the patch. Though I would like > >> if Pablo or Patrick confirm its correctness. Thanks! > > > > I'll apply this once Patrick or Pablo have a look at it. > > I think that the patch attached is better since it removes the overhead > of the IPv6 dependency, which is indeed too much for the use of one > function. Thanks. I think it's a lot better too, applied, thanks!