From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v2)
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:11:25 -0700
Message-ID: <20090414141125.53af6fdc@nehalam>
References: <20090411174801.GG6822@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<18913.53699.544083.320542@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
	<20090412173108.GO6822@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20090412.181330.23529546.davem@davemloft.net>
	<20090413040413.GQ6822@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20090413095309.631cf395@nehalam>
	<49E48136.5060700@trash.net>
	<49E49C65.8060808@cosmosbay.com>
	<20090414074554.7fa73e2f@nehalam>
	<49E4B0A5.70404@cosmosbay.com>
	<b6a2187b0904140951r3c6a41fdnc26b149202bdfa84@mail.gmail.com>
	<20090414111716.28585806@nehalam>
	<49E4E3E8.5090201@cosmosbay.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, paulus@samba.org,
	mingo@elte.hu, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com,
	jengelh@medozas.de, r000n@r000n.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <49E4E3E8.5090201@cosmosbay.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

> Oh well, it seems factorization of this stuff is not what you want, so
> I'll stop arguing.

That's no fun..  I didn't mind the refactorizing, but was concerned
that it caused the locking to be out of line in fast path.