From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11) Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20090421.014923.169153421.davem@davemloft.net> References: <49ED6D2E.5060808@cn.fujitsu.com> <20090421081649.GA16782@ioremap.net> <49ED8700.3010603@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: zbr@ioremap.net, shemminger@vyatta.com, dada1@cosmosbay.com, paulus@samba.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kaber@trash.net, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu, jengelh@medozas.de, r000n@r000n.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca To: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49ED8700.3010603@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org From: Lai Jiangshan Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 16:42:40 +0800 > softirq is always not nesting. Why we need recursive lock? Netfilter itself, is nesting. When using bridging netfilter, iptables can be entered twice in the same call chain.