From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu recursive lock (v11) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:13:18 +0000 Message-ID: <20090422101318.GA6630@ff.dom.local> References: <49EEDAF0.2010507@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ingo Molnar , Stephen Hemminger , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Paul Mackerras , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Evgeniy Polyakov , David Miller , kaber@trash.net, jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, jengelh@medozas.de, r000n@r000n.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com ([209.85.198.233]:56473 "EHLO rv-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754389AbZDVKNd (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:13:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49EEDAF0.2010507@cosmosbay.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 22-04-2009 10:53, Eric Dumazet wrote: ... > If this could be done without recursion, I am pretty sure netfilter > and network guys would have done it. I found Linus reaction quite > shocking IMHO, considering hard work done by all people on this. Right, looks like 100% (Scandinavian?!) troll. I wonder where is the admin of this mess... Jarek P.