netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, dada1@cosmosbay.com, zbr@ioremap.net,
	jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org, jengelh@medozas.de,
	r000n@r000n.net, benh@kernel.crashing.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] v1 expedited "big hammer" RCU grace periods
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:15:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090423151509.GB6877@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49F006AE.5040104@cn.fujitsu.com>

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:11:58PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Paul E. McKenney wrote:

[ . . . ]

> Hi, Paul
> 
> I just typed codes in email, very like these two pathes:
> 
> [PATCH 1/2] sched: Introduce APIs for waiting multi events
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/14/733
> 
> [PATCH 2/2] rcupdate: use struct ref_completion
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/14/734
> 
> Lai.
> --------------

Interesting approach!  This would get a second use for your multi-events
waiting code above.  ;-)

Looks like the idea is to have the task doing the
synchronize_rcu_bh_expedited() hold a reference across the process,
and have each rcu_bh_fast_qs() also acquire a reference, which would
be released in the softirq handler synchronize_rcu_bh_expedited_help().

One question -- does this approach correctly handle all the CPU hotplug
scenarios?  (I think that it might, but am not completely certain.)

							Thanx, Paul

> #ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> 
> static void __init synchronize_rcu_expedited_init(void)
> {
> }
> 
> void synchronize_rcu_bh_expedited(void)
> {
> 	cond_resched();
> }
> 
> #else /* #ifndef CONFIG_SMP */
> 
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(synchronize_rcu_bh_mutex);
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, call_only_once); /* is it need ? */
> static struct ref_completion rcu_bh_expedited_completion
> 
> static void synchronize_rcu_bh_expedited_help(struct softirq_action *unused)
> {
> 	if (__get_cpu_var(call_only_once)) {
> 		smp_mb();
> 		ref_completion_put(&rcu_bh_expedited_completion);
> 		__get_cpu_var(call_only_once) = 0;
> 	}
> }
> 
> static void rcu_bh_fast_qs(void *unused)
> {
> 	__get_cpu_var(call_only_once) = 1;
> 	ref_completion_get(&rcu_bh_expedited_completion);
> 	raise_softirq(RCU_EXPEDITED_SOFTIRQ);
> }
> 
> static void __init synchronize_rcu_expedited_init(void)
> {
> 	open_softirq(RCU_EXPEDITED_SOFTIRQ, synchronize_rcu_bh_expedited_help);
> }
> 
> void synchronize_rcu_bh_expedited(void)
> {
> 	mutex_lock(&synchronize_rcu_bh_mutex);
> 
> 	ref_completion_get_init(&rcu_bh_expedited_completion);
> 
> 	smp_call_function(rcu_bh_fast_qs, NULL, 1);
> 
> 	ref_completion_put_init(&rcu_bh_expedited_completion);
> 	ref_completion_wait(&rcu_bh_expedited_completion);
> 
> 	mutex_unlock(&synchronize_rcu_bh_mutex);
> }
> 
> #endif /* #else #ifndef CONFIG_SMP */
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-23 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-23  5:25 [PATCH RFC] v1 expedited "big hammer" RCU grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-23  6:11 ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-04-23 15:15   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2009-04-24  0:39     ` Lai Jiangshan
2009-04-24  1:13       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-23  7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-23 15:34   ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-23 15:47     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-23 18:29       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-23 13:45 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-23 16:54   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090423151509.GB6877@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=r000n@r000n.net \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).