From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pud Subject: Re: IMQ bug: kernel reboot immediately Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 14:03:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20090502120312.GA3756@safeTpin.homeunix.org> References: <200904222327392967897@gmail.com> Reply-To: pud@subnet666.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx02.qsc.de ([213.148.130.14]:52156 "EHLO mx02.qsc.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753451AbZEBM0T (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 08:26:19 -0400 Received: from safetpin.homeunix.org (port-87-234-80-215.dynamic.qsc.de [87.234.80.215]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A2416C010E for ; Sat, 2 May 2009 14:03:15 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200904222327392967897@gmail.com> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Y. D. wrote: > Is IMQ still maintained? I am using IMQ to shape ingress traffic. > But the application is a streaming server (VLC). However, the kernel > reboots immediately as quick as can hardly been seen what is > wrong with it. wrong list i guess :) latest working patches that were posted on imq-list are available here: http://www.student.oulu.fi/~jukivili/imq/ i know that esp. netdev (sorry, i'm not subscribed there) folks don't like imq so much, but because documentation for ifb and related stuff really sucks (for users) a lot of people stick to imq, even if ifb might be a better solution, technically [really, for all (a)dsl users it's no alternative, yet] but... if anyone wants to have a look at that patches, give some (constructive) feedback, you're welcome i'll forward them to imq list, if you like =;p/ud aka nerdpunk -- gpg-key #C3B04767