netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kaber@trash.net
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ctnetlink: fix wrong message type in user updates
Date: Tue, 05 May 2009 15:14:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090505131429.7241.88268.stgit@Decadence> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090505131219.7241.85258.stgit@Decadence>

This patch fixes the wrong message type that are triggered by
user updates, the following commands:

(term1)# conntrack -I -p tcp -s 1.1.1.1 -d 2.2.2.2 -t 10 --sport 10 --dport 20 --state LISTEN
(term1)# conntrack -U -p tcp -s 1.1.1.1 -d 2.2.2.2 -t 10 --sport 10 --dport 20 --state SYN_SENT
(term1)# conntrack -U -p tcp -s 1.1.1.1 -d 2.2.2.2 -t 10 --sport 10 --dport 20 --state SYN_RECV

only trigger event message of type NEW, when only the first is NEW
while others should be UPDATE.

(term2)# conntrack -E
    [NEW] tcp      6 10 LISTEN src=1.1.1.1 dst=2.2.2.2 sport=10 dport=20 [UNREPLIED] src=2.2.2.2 dst=1.1.1.1 sport=20 dport=10 mark=0
    [NEW] tcp      6 10 SYN_SENT src=1.1.1.1 dst=2.2.2.2 sport=10 dport=20 [UNREPLIED] src=2.2.2.2 dst=1.1.1.1 sport=20 dport=10 mark=0
    [NEW] tcp      6 10 SYN_RECV src=1.1.1.1 dst=2.2.2.2 sport=10 dport=20 [UNREPLIED] src=2.2.2.2 dst=1.1.1.1 sport=20 dport=10 mark=0

This patch also removes IPCT_REFRESH from the bitmask since it is
not of any use.

Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---

 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c |   48 ++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index f13fc57..c523f0b 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -1186,28 +1186,6 @@ ctnetlink_change_conntrack(struct nf_conn *ct, struct nlattr *cda[])
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static inline void
-ctnetlink_event_report(struct nf_conn *ct, u32 pid, int report)
-{
-	unsigned int events = 0;
-
-	if (test_bit(IPS_EXPECTED_BIT, &ct->status))
-		events |= IPCT_RELATED;
-	else
-		events |= IPCT_NEW;
-
-	nf_conntrack_event_report(IPCT_STATUS |
-				  IPCT_HELPER |
-				  IPCT_REFRESH |
-				  IPCT_PROTOINFO |
-				  IPCT_NATSEQADJ |
-				  IPCT_MARK |
-				  events,
-				  ct,
-				  pid,
-				  report);
-}
-
 static struct nf_conn *
 ctnetlink_create_conntrack(struct nlattr *cda[],
 			   struct nf_conntrack_tuple *otuple,
@@ -1373,6 +1351,7 @@ ctnetlink_new_conntrack(struct sock *ctnl, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		err = -ENOENT;
 		if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_CREATE) {
 			struct nf_conn *ct;
+			enum ip_conntrack_events events;
 
 			ct = ctnetlink_create_conntrack(cda, &otuple,
 							&rtuple, u3);
@@ -1383,9 +1362,18 @@ ctnetlink_new_conntrack(struct sock *ctnl, struct sk_buff *skb,
 			err = 0;
 			nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general);
 			spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
-			ctnetlink_event_report(ct,
-					       NETLINK_CB(skb).pid,
-					       nlmsg_report(nlh));
+			if (test_bit(IPS_EXPECTED_BIT, &ct->status))
+				events = IPCT_RELATED;
+			else
+				events = IPCT_NEW;
+
+			nf_conntrack_event_report(IPCT_STATUS |
+						  IPCT_HELPER |
+						  IPCT_PROTOINFO |
+						  IPCT_NATSEQADJ |
+						  IPCT_MARK | events,
+						  ct, NETLINK_CB(skb).pid,
+						  nlmsg_report(nlh));
 			nf_ct_put(ct);
 		} else
 			spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
@@ -1404,9 +1392,13 @@ ctnetlink_new_conntrack(struct sock *ctnl, struct sk_buff *skb,
 		if (err == 0) {
 			nf_conntrack_get(&ct->ct_general);
 			spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);
-			ctnetlink_event_report(ct,
-					       NETLINK_CB(skb).pid,
-					       nlmsg_report(nlh));
+			nf_conntrack_event_report(IPCT_STATUS |
+						  IPCT_HELPER |
+						  IPCT_PROTOINFO |
+						  IPCT_NATSEQADJ |
+						  IPCT_MARK,
+						  ct, NETLINK_CB(skb).pid,
+						  nlmsg_report(nlh));
 			nf_ct_put(ct);
 		} else
 			spin_unlock_bh(&nf_conntrack_lock);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-05-05 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-05 13:13 [PATCH 0/2] netfilter fixes for 2.6.30-rc Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-05-05 13:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] netfilter: iptables: fix use of cluster match with 32 nodes Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-05-05 15:47   ` Patrick McHardy
2009-05-05 13:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2009-05-05 15:49   ` [PATCH 2/2] netfilter: ctnetlink: fix wrong message type in user updates Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090505131429.7241.88268.stgit@Decadence \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).