From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>,
netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
dougthompson-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
bluesmoke-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org,
Patrick McHardy <kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>,
christine.caulfield-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org,
Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org,
yoshfuji-VfPWfsRibaP+Ru+s062T9g@public.gmane.org,
shemminger-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org,
neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org,
linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org,
adilger-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org,
netfilter-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] cfq-iosched: Uses its own open-coded rcu_barrier.
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:05:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090624140505.GA6779@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090624064236.GE31415-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 08:42:37AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23 2009, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > This module cfq-iosched, has discovered the value of waiting for
> > call_rcu() completion, but its has its own open-coded implementation
> > of rcu_barrier(), which I don't think is 'strong' enough.
> >
> > This patch only leaves a comment for the maintainers to consider.
>
> We need a stronger primitive and rcu_barrier(), since we also need to
> wait for the rcu calls to even be scheduled. So I don't think the below
> can be improved, it's already fine.
It is indeed important to first prevent new call_rcu() instances from
being invoked, and only then invoke rcu_barrier().
Thanx, Paul
> > Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> >
> > block/cfq-iosched.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > index 833ec18..c15555b 100644
> > --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > @@ -2657,6 +2657,12 @@ static void __exit cfq_exit(void)
> > /*
> > * this also protects us from entering cfq_slab_kill() with
> > * pending RCU callbacks
> > + *
> > + * hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org 2009-06-18: Maintainer please consider using
> > + * rcu_barrier() instead of this open-coded wait for
> > + * completion implementation. I think it provides a better
> > + * guarantee that all CPUs are finished, although
> > + * elv_ioc_count_read() do consider all CPUs.
> > */
> > if (elv_ioc_count_read(ioc_count))
> > wait_for_completion(&all_gone);
> >
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-24 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-23 15:03 [PATCH 00/10] We must use rcu_barrier() on module unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:03 ` [PATCH 01/10] ext4: Use " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-07-06 2:31 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 02/10] bridge: Use rcu_barrier() instead of syncronize_net() on unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 03/10] mac80211: Use rcu_barrier() " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:15 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1245770155.21314.38.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-24 10:06 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 10:21 ` Johannes Berg
[not found] ` <1245838862.21314.48.camel-YfaajirXv2244ywRPIzf9A@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-24 11:32 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 11:39 ` Johannes Berg
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 04/10] sunrpc: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 16:59 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 05/10] nfs: Use rcu_barrier() on module unload Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 06/10] ipv6: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 07/10] decnet: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 6:23 ` Chrissie Caulfield
2009-06-24 11:44 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
[not found] ` <1245843884.6695.54.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-24 12:09 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
[not found] ` <1245845367.24921.3.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-24 13:50 ` Chrissie Caulfield
[not found] ` <5A680E0A-EFEB-44EA-9F06-F338E6CBD6D1-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-25 11:52 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
[not found] ` <1245930729.24921.67.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-25 23:10 ` David Miller
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 08/10] edac_core: Uses call_rcu() and its own wait_for_completion scheme Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 09/10] cfq-iosched: Uses its own open-coded rcu_barrier Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 6:42 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20090624064236.GE31415-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
2009-06-24 14:05 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2009-06-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] nf_conntrack: Use rcu_barrier() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-23 16:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-24 9:02 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 9:40 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] nf_conntrack: Use rcu_barrier() and fix kmem_cache_create flags Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-24 13:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-25 9:29 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-25 10:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] nf_conntrack: Use rcu_barrier() Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-06-25 14:33 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-25 13:59 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] nf_conntrack: Use rcu_barrier() and fix kmem_cache_create flags Patrick McHardy
2009-06-25 19:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-24 1:44 ` [PATCH 00/10] We must use rcu_barrier() on module unload Paul E. McKenney
2009-06-24 7:02 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090624140505.GA6779@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck-23vcf4htsmix0ybbhkvfkdbpr1lh4cv8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=adilger-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bluesmoke-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=christine.caulfield-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dougthompson-aS9lmoZGLiVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hawk-4UpuNZONu4c@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=johannes-cdvu00un1VgdHxzADdlk8Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=kaber-dcUjhNyLwpNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=neilb-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=shemminger-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=tytso-3s7WtUTddSA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=yoshfuji-VfPWfsRibaP+Ru+s062T9g@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).