From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [patch] ipvs: fwmark services don't have ports Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 19:48:00 +1100 Message-ID: <20091207084800.GA9529@verge.net.au> References: <20091207035505.GC419@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Deon van der Merwe , Julian Anastasov , Patrick McHardy To: lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091207035505.GC419@verge.net.au> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 02:55:05PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote: > Make sure that the port for fwmark services is always zero, it seems that > in some cases ipvsadm provides bogus port values for fwmark services. As > observed by Deon van der Merwe, this manifests as a clients not being able > to connect to the virtual service if persistence is set. > > Tested-by: Deon van der Merwe > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman > > --- > > I believe that this fixes a bug and as such is suitable for -stable. > However, Its taken a few release for anyone to bring this to our attention, > so it doesn't seem to be causing much pain in the wild. > > Discussion of this problem: > http://archive.linuxvirtualserver.org/html/lvs-users/2009-11/msg00043.html Sorry for the noise. Please hold on this. There is still not consensus in the original thread.